Lack of Consensus Among Stroke Experts on the Optimal Management of Patients With Acute Tandem Occlusion
- 1 May 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Stroke
- Vol. 50 (5), 1254-1256
- https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.118.023758
Abstract
Background and Purpose—: In patients with acute stroke caused by tandem occlusion, the benefit of immediate revascularization (stenting) of the cervical internal carotid artery lesion during endovascular thrombectomy is uncertain. We sought to determine current practice patterns and whether consensus existed among physicians with stroke expertise. Methods—: We distributed an online survey to stroke experts affiliated with the Canadian Stroke Consortium, the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology, and international ESCAPE trial (Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion With Emphasis on Minimizing CT to Recanalization Times) collaborators. Questions were based on clinical scenarios, and multiple choice responses across a Likert-type scale were provided. The survey was sent out in September 2017. After 2 months, data were extracted and then analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results—: Responses from 162 stroke experts were analyzed; most were stroke physicians (n=65, 40.1%) and neurointerventionalists (n=74, 45.7%), from Canada (n=95, 58.6%), the United States (n=42, 25.9%), and other countries (n=25, 15.4%). Over half (n=96, 59.3%) of respondents consider acute stenting of the cervical internal carotid artery as a treatment option, whereas 40.7% (n=66) would never use it. Most respondents (n=113, 69.8%) agree that there exists uncertainty about the optimal acute management of patients with tandem occlusion. A majority (n=88, 54.3%) of physicians surveyed would include patients in a randomized trial addressing this question. Conclusions—: This survey shows high variability in practice about acute management of tandem occlusion. The existence of community equipoise underscores the importance of a randomized trial evaluating the benefit of acute internal carotid artery stenting in patients with tandem occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of tandem occlusions in acute ischemic stroke – intracranial versus extracranial first and extracranial stenting versus angioplasty alone: a systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2018
- 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke AssociationStroke, 2018
- Letter by Poppe et al Regarding Article, “Emergent Carotid Stenting After Thrombectomy in Patients With Tandem Lesions”Stroke, 2017
- Stroke doctors: Who are we? A World Stroke Organization surveyInternational Journal of Stroke, 2017
- Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet Neurology, 2016
- Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2016
- Emergency Stenting of the Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery in Combination with Anterior Circulation Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Multicenter StudyAmerican Journal Of Neuroradiology, 2015
- Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy after Intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA Alone in StrokeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic StrokeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke with Perfusion-Imaging SelectionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015