Nonresponse Bias in a Follow-up Study of 19-Year-Old Adolescents Born as Preterm Infants
Open Access
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in PEDIATRICS
- Vol. 116 (5), e662-e666
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-0682
Abstract
Objective. To assess the effect of demographic and neonatal risk factors and outcome at the last available assessment on the probability of full responders, postal responders (those who only responded to the mailed questionnaire), or nonresponders in a follow-up study of 19-year-old adolescents who were born as preterm infants.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is attrition bias a problem in neonatal follow-up?Early Human Development, 2005
- Outcomes in Young Adulthood for Very-Low-Birth-Weight InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Looking back in time: outcome of a national cohort of very preterm infants born in The Netherlands in 1983Early Human Development, 2000
- Loss to follow-up: does it matter?The Lancet, 1995
- Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropoutsThe Lancet, 1995
- Importance of complete follow-up of spontaneous fetal loss after amniocentesis and chorion villus samplingThe Lancet, 1992
- Cohort reconstruction: which infants can be restudied at school age?Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 1991
- Outcome among surviving very low birthweight infants: a meta-analysis.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1991
- NEONATAL MORTALITY RISK IN RELATION TO GESTATIONAL AGE AND BIRTHWEIGHT: Results of a National Survey of Preterm and Very-low-birthweight Infants in the NetherlandsThe Lancet, 1986
- Who Goes and Who StaysJournal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 1985