Occupational Exposure to Sharp Injuries Among Jordanian Health Care Workers
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
- Vol. 17 (3), 169-174
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0b013e31819b8d10
Abstract
Objectives: (a) Determine the effects of the following variables (sex, age, experience years, hospital sector, occupation group, education level, working area, shift, timing of occurrence of injuries, hospital location) on the number of exposure to sharp injuries (SIs) among Jordanian health care workers (HCWs), (b) determine the number of exposure cases to SIs among subgroups within each selected variable, (c) identify the percentages of HCWs who were exposed to SIs in the last 12 months, and (d) identify the types of devices involved in SIs based on the responses of different occupational groups. Method: Cross-sectional design was used. Data were collected using a survey that was developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Participants: One thousand sixty-eight HCWs who work in private and public Jordanian hospitals participated in the survey. Results: The HCWs whose sex; age; experience years; hospital sector, occupation group; education level; working area; shift; timing of occurrence of injuries; hospital location were female, younger than 30years old, more than 2 years, public, nurses, a bachelor degree, intensive care unit, between 3 pm and 11 pm, their injuries were during use of devises/instruments, the location of the hospital they work in was in the central of Jordan, respectively, exposed more to SIs comparing the subgroups within each other. Eighty-eight (8.2%) of HCWs were not exposed to SIs in the last 12 months, 427 (39.9%) were exposed to only 1sharp injury, 164 (15.4%) were exposed to 2 SIs, 169 (15.8%) were exposed to 3 SIs, 83 (7.8%) were exposed to 4 SIs, 95 (8.9%) were exposed to 5 SIs, and 42 of HCWs (3.9%) did not designate. Nurses (n=745, 81%) were the most occupational group involved in SIs, whereas midwives were the least (n = 5, 1%). In addition, used needles for injections were the instruments most involved in SIs (58.7%), whereas surgical dressing set was the least (8.5%). Conclusions: Occupational exposure to SIs is a significant problem facing Jordanian HCWs, which put them at serious risk of infection from blood-borne pathogens.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hepatitis needs assessment among Jordanian healthcare workersInternational Nursing Review, 2008
- Shift work and work injury in the New Zealand Blood Donors' Health StudyOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2006
- Estimate of the Annual Number of Percutaneous Injuries Among Hospital-Based Healthcare Workers in the United States, 1997–1998Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2004
- Occupational exposure to needlestick injuries and hepatitis B vaccination coverage among health care workers in EgyptAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2003
- Post-exposure prophylaxis for blood borne viral infections in healthcare workersPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2003
- The Prevalence of Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C and Human Immune Deficiency Virus Markers in Multi-transfused PatientsJournal of Tropical Pediatrics, 2001
- A New Approach to Needlestick Injuries Among Health Care WorkersApplied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 1999
- Etiologies and sequelae of excessive daytime sleepinessClinical Therapeutics, 1996
- Effect of Time of Day and Duration into Shift on Hazardous Exposures to Biological FluidsAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Injections: A fatal attraction?Social Science & Medicine, 1990