Emergency Department Patients With Diabetes Have Better Glycemic Control When They Have Identifiable Primary Care Providers
Open Access
- 25 May 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 19 (6), 650-655
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01366.x
Abstract
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2012; 19:00–00 © 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Abstract Objectives: The objective was to determine if emergency department (ED) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who have primary care providers (PCPs) have better control of their DM than patients with no PCPs. Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional, observation study at a large, adult, urban, academic ED with 85,000 annual visits. ED patients with a history of DM were eligible. Patients with severe systemic disease, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), sepsis, active steroid use, pregnancy, or cognitive impairment were excluded. Consenting patients had hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) analysis and completed a questionnaire regarding demographics, lifestyle, medication usage, educational level attained, and health care access, including whether or not they had PCPs. HgbA1c levels were compared between subjects with and without PCPs using medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs). A continuous plot was developed to demonstrate the proportion of patients without PCPs (PCP−) compared to those with PCPs (PCP+) at every level of %HgbA1c across the entire measured range. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine which clinical and demographic factors obtained from the questionnaire were associated with improved glycemic control (increased relative risk [RR] of having a %HgbA1c < 8%). Results: A total of 284 patients were screened; 227 were enrolled, had HgbA1c analysis performed, and had complete PCP, race, and sex information. Complete demographic data (insurance status, employment status, etc.) were available on 209 subjects. Sixty-four of the 227 patients (28.2%) denied having PCPs. Median HgbA1c was 7.7% (IQR = 6.5% to 9.68%) in PCP+ versus 8.9% (IQR = 6.8% to 11.3%) in PCP− patients (p = 0.01). Ninety-one of 163 (55.8%) PCP+ subjects had a median HgbA1c < 8% versus 25 of 64 (39.1%) in the PCP− group (p = 0.02). After adjusting for multiple clinical and demographic variables, having a PCP remained significantly associated with a median HgbA1c value less than 8% (RR = 1.43; p = 0.04). Conclusions: Diabetes control was significantly better in patients with PCPs, even after adjusting for a number of potentially confounding social and demographic factors.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Follow‐up to a Federally Qualified Health Center and Subsequent Emergency Department UtilizationAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2010
- Glucose Control and Vascular Complications in Veterans with Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- When a Usual Source of Care and Usual Provider Matter: Adult Prevention and Screening ServicesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Glycemic control and macrovascular disease in types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: Meta-analysis of randomized trialsAmerican Heart Journal, 2006
- Intensive Diabetes Treatment and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 1 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in Access to Medical CareMedical Care Research and Review, 2000
- Asian American and Pacific Islander breast and cervical carcinoma screening rates and Healthy People 2000 objectivesCancer, 2000
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- Relationship between lactate dehydrogenase and myeloperoxidase levels in human gingival crevicular fluid and clinical and microbial measurementsJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1988