Feasibility of Delaying Removal of Row Covers to Suppress Bacterial Wilt of Muskmelon (Cucumis melo)
Open Access
- 1 June 2011
- journal article
- Published by Scientific Societies in Plant Disease
- Vol. 95 (6), 729-734
- https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-11-10-0788
Abstract
Bacterial wilt, caused by Erwinia tracheiphila, is a major disease of cucurbit crops in the United States. Management of the disease relies on controlling two vector species, striped (Acalymma vittatum) and spotted (Diabrotica undecimpunctata) cucumber beetles. Six field trials were conducted at Iowa State University research farms during 2007, 2008, and 2009 to assess the efficacy of delayed removal of spunbond polypropylene row covers to control bacterial wilt on muskmelon (Cucumis melo). Treatments were (i) row cover removed at anthesis (conventional timing of removal), (ii) covers removed 10 days after row cover ends were opened at anthesis, (iii) covers removed 10 days after bumble bee hives were inserted under row covers at anthesis, and (iv) a noncovered control. In two field trials during 2007 and 2008, the delayed-removal row-cover treatments significantly suppressed bacterial wilt throughout the growing season and enhanced yield compared with the noncovered and removal-at-anthesis controls. In Gilbert in 2008, however, bacterial wilt suppression was equivalent among all three row-cover treatments. No bacterial wilt was observed during three trials in 2009, and there was minimal difference in marketable yield among treatments. Net returns were compared using partial budget and sensitivity analyses. Melon prices and occurrence of bacterial wilt had a strong impact on net returns. Using row covers increased production costs by 45%. In site years in which bacterial wilt occurred, delaying removal of row covers resulted in the highest returns. When bacterial wilt was absent, however, the delayed-removal row-cover treatments had the lowest returns. Results of the sensitivity analysis indicated that delaying removal of row covers for 10 days could be a cost-effective component of an integrated bacterial wilt suppression strategy for muskmelon where bacterial wilt occurs ≥50% of production seasons.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Row Covers on Suppression of Bacterial Wilt of Muskmelon in IowaPlant Health Progress, 2006
- Effect of Insect Exclusion on the Incidence of Yellow Vine Disease and of the Associated Bacterium in SquashPlant Disease, 2001
- Growth and yield of muskmelon in response to plastic mulch and row coversScientia Horticulturae, 2001
- Serological Estimates of the Seasonal Dynamics ofErwinia tracheiphilainAcalymma vittata(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)Environmental Entomology, 1999
- Imidacloprid Effects on Acalymma vittata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Bacterial Wilt in CantaloupeJournal of Economic Entomology, 1998
- Herbaceous Weeds Are Not Ecologically Important Reservoirs ofErwinia tracheiphilaPlant Disease, 1998
- Differential susceptibility of pumpkins to bacterial wilt related to plant growth stage and cultivarCrop Protection, 1997
- Honey bees placed under row covers affect muskmelon yield and qualityScientia Horticulturae, 1991
- Influence of Cucurbitacin Content in Cotyledons of Cucurbitaceae Cultivars upon Feeding Behavior of Diabroticina Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)Journal of Economic Entomology, 1983
- Cucurbitacins as kairomones for diabroticite beetlesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1980