Positively Charged Residues Are the Major Determinants of Ribosomal Velocity
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 12 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Biology
- Vol. 11 (3), e1001508
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001508
Abstract
Both for understanding mechanisms of disease and for the design of transgenes, it is important to understand the determinants of ribosome velocity, as changes in the rate of translation are important for protein folding, error attenuation, and localization. While there is great variation in ribosomal occupancy along even a single transcript, what determines a ribosome's occupancy is unclear. We examine this issue using data from a ribosomal footprinting assay in yeast. While codon usage is classically considered a major determinant, we find no evidence for this. By contrast, we find that positively charged amino acids greatly retard ribosomes downstream from where they are encoded, consistent with the suggestion that positively charged residues interact with the negatively charged ribosomal exit tunnel. Such slowing is independent of and greater than the average effect owing to mRNA folding. The effect of charged amino acids is additive, with ribosomal occupancy well-predicted by a linear fit to the density of positively charged residues. We thus expect that a translated poly-A tail, encoding for positively charged lysines regardless of the reading frame, would act as a sandtrap for the ribosome, consistent with experimental data. Ribosomes do not synthesize protein at a constant rate along transcripts, and changes in translation speed can have knock-on consequences for the expression of that protein, even altering its folding or subcellular localization. It has long been thought that RNA-level features modulate translation rates, whether by delays incurred through the presence of codons that require relatively rare tRNAs, or by regions of mRNA folding that physically impede ribosomal progression. We find on the contrary that it is not RNA-level features but positive charges in the already translated protein that most retard ribosomes, possibly by interacting with the negatively charged ribosomal exit tunnel. We show that positive charge explains the sites where ribosomes stall most commonly within transcripts. We also show why, if protein charge were not considered, one could be misled into suspecting a role for non-optimal codons. Finally, we observe that the poly-A tail provides a massively positively charged terminus no matter in which frame it is translated. A missed stop codon or frameshifting would then lead to a stalled ribosome, which is consistent with experimental data.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- The anti-Shine–Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteriaNature, 2012
- Genes adopt non‐optimal codon usage to generate cell cycle‐dependent oscillations in protein levelsMolecular Systems Biology, 2012
- Ribosome Profiling of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Reveals the Complexity and Dynamics of Mammalian ProteomesCell, 2011
- Role of a ribosome-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase in protein quality controlNature, 2010
- A ribosome-associating factor chaperones tail-anchored membrane proteinsNature, 2010
- GroEL dependency affects codon usage—support for a critical role of misfolding in gene evolutionMolecular Systems Biology, 2010
- Electrostatics in the Ribosomal Tunnel Modulate Chain Elongation RatesJournal of Molecular Biology, 2008
- Following translation by single ribosomes one codon at a timeNature, 2008
- Translation of nonSTOP mRNA is repressed post-initiation in mammalian cellsThe EMBO Journal, 2007
- Endonucleolytic cleavage of eukaryotic mRNAs with stalls in translation elongationNature, 2006