Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Lancet
- Vol. 356 (9237), 1228-1231
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02786-0
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Being a modern pharmaceutical companyBMJ, 1998
- Quinine for nocturnal leg crampsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1998
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 1998
- Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysesJAMA, 1998
- Empirical evidence of bias in infertility research: overestimation of treatment effect in crossover trials using pregnancy as the outcome measureFertility and Sterility, 1996
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- Should Unpublished Data Be Included in Meta-analyses?JAMA, 1993
- Prevention of First Bleeding in CirrhosisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Fluoxetine and suicide: a meta-analysis of controlled trials of treatment for depression.BMJ, 1991
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991