ADHD in DSM-5: a field trial in a large, representative sample of 18- to 19-year-old adults
Open Access
- 23 June 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychological Medicine
- Vol. 45 (2), 361-373
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291714001470
Abstract
Background: The DSM criteria for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have not been tested in American Psychiatric Association (APA) field trials for either DSM-IV or DSM-5. This study aimed to assess: (a) the prevalence of ADHD according to DSM-5 criteria; (b) the factor solution that provides the best fit for ADHD symptoms; (c) the symptoms with the highest predictive value for clinical impairment; and (d) the best symptomatic threshold for each ADHD dimension (inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity).Method: Trained psychologists evaluated 4000 young adults from the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study with an instrument covering all DSM-5 ADHD criteria. A series of confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) tested the best factor structure. Complex logistic regressions assessed differential contributions of each symptom to clinical impairment. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses tested which would be the best symptomatic cut-off in the number of symptoms for predicting impairment.Results: The prevalence of DSM-5 ADHD was 3.55% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.98–4.12]. The estimated prevalence of DSM-IV ADHD was 2.8%. CFA revealed that a bifactor model with a single general factor and two specific factors provided the best fit for DSM-5 symptoms. Inattentive symptoms continued to be the most important predictors of impairment in adults. The best cut-offs were five symptoms of inattention and four symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity.Conclusions: Our results, combined with previous findings, suggest a 27% increase in the expected prevalence of ADHD among young adults, comparing DSM-IV to DSM-5 criteria. The DSM-5 symptomatic organization derived a similar factor structure for adults as DSM-IV symptoms. Data using DSM-5 criteria support lowering the symptomatic threshold for diagnosing ADHD in adults.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of DSM-IV attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom dimensions and subtypes.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2012
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Australian Adults: Prevalence, Persistence, Conduct Problems and DisadvantagePLOS ONE, 2012
- Current Self-Reported Symptoms of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Are Associated with Total Brain Volume in Healthy AdultsPLOS ONE, 2012
- A Population-Based Study of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms and Associated Impairment in Middle-Aged AdultsPLOS ONE, 2012
- The hierarchical factor model of ADHD: invariant across age and national groupings?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2011
- External Validation of Bifactor Model of ADHD: Explaining Heterogeneity in Psychiatric Comorbidity, Cognitive Control, and Personality Trait Profiles Within DSM-IV ADHDJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2011
- Structure and Diagnosis of Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderArchives of General Psychiatry, 2010
- Revisiting the latent structure of ADHD: is there a ‘g’ factor?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2010
- Multimodel InferenceSociological Methods & Research, 2004
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999