Preventive home visits to older home-dwelling people in Denmark: are invitational procedures of importance?
- 19 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Health & Social Care in the Community
- Vol. 18 (6), 563-571
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00941.x
Abstract
Since 1998 all municipalities in Denmark have been required by law to offer two annual preventive home visits to all home-dwelling citizens aged 75 or over. The influence of invitational procedures on acceptance rates has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe and investigate whether different invitational procedures were associated with first preventive home visit acceptance rates. The study was based on secondary analyses of data from the Danish Intervention Study on Preventive Home Visits. Data were collected from 1998 to 2002. Of the 4060 participants in the main study, 3245 reported receiving an offer for an identifiable preventive home visit, of whom 2399 (73.9%) provided complete data for the main analyses in the present study. Invitational procedures were categorised as: (1) a letter with a proposed date and time for the visit, (2) a visitor telephone call, and (3) a letter with encouragement to phone the visitor for appointment (letter without a proposed date). Covariates included sex, age, experience with preventive interventions, functional ability, self rated health, social relations and psychosocial characteristics. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, and bi- and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Different invitational procedures were associated with first preventive home visit acceptance rates. Significantly more men (75.1%) than women (62.8%) declined the first preventive home visit regardless of the invitational procedure. Compared to 'letter with a proposed date', men had an odds ratio of 1.78 (95% CI: 1.16-2.74) for declining visits when 'telephone call' was used and an odds ratio 2.81 (95% CI: 1.79-4.40) when 'letter without a proposed date' was used as the invitational procedure. In women the odds ratios were 1.23 (95% CI: 0.91-1.68) and 1.87 (95% CI: 1.37-2.55), respectively.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The future role of general practice: managing multiple agendasScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2009
- Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2008
- Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment: Back to the Future Multidimensional Preventive Home Visit Programs for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsThe Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 2008
- Educational intervention toward preventive home visitors reduced functional decline in community-living older womenJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007
- Preventive home visitation programmes for older people: the role of municipality organisationEuropean Journal of Ageing, 2007
- The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Home-Based Nursing Health Promotion for Older People: A Review of the LiteratureMedical Care Research and Review, 2006
- Feasible Model for Prevention of Functional Decline in Older People: Municipality‐Randomized, Controlled TrialJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2005
- Invitation to a population-based cohort study: differences between subjects recruited using various strategiesScandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2002
- Effectiveness of home based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis Commentary: When, where, and why do preventive home visitsBMJ, 2001
- Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trialsThe Lancet, 1993