C-Reactive Protein, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and Orthopedic Implant Infection
Open Access
- 22 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 5 (2), e9358
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009358
Abstract
C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) have been shown to be useful for diagnosis of prosthetic hip and knee infection. Little information is available on CRP and ESR in patients undergoing revision or resection of shoulder arthroplasties or spine implants. We analyzed preoperative CRP and ESR in 636 subjects who underwent knee (n = 297), hip (n = 221) or shoulder (n = 64) arthroplasty, or spine implant (n = 54) removal. A standardized definition of orthopedic implant-associated infection was applied. Receiver operating curve analysis was used to determine ideal cutoff values for differentiating infected from non-infected cases. ESR was significantly different in subjects with aseptic failure infection of knee (median 11 and 53.5 mm/h, respectively, p = <0.0001) and hip (median 11 and 30 mm/h, respectively, p = <0.0001) arthroplasties and spine implants (median 10 and 48.5 mm/h, respectively, p = 0.0033), but not shoulder arthroplasties (median 10 and 9 mm/h, respectively, p = 0.9883). Optimized ESR cutoffs for knee, hip and shoulder arthroplasties and spine implants were 19, 13, 26, and 45 mm/h, respectively. Using these cutoffs, sensitivity and specificity to detect infection were 89 and 74% for knee, 82 and 60% for hip, and 32 and 93% for shoulder arthroplasties, and 57 and 90% for spine implants. CRP was significantly different in subjects with aseptic failure and infection of knee (median 4 and 51 mg/l, respectively, p<0.0001), hip (median 3 and 18 mg/l, respectively, p<0.0001), and shoulder (median 3 and 10 mg/l, respectively, p = 0.01) arthroplasties, and spine implants (median 3 and 20 mg/l, respectively, p = 0.0011). Optimized CRP cutoffs for knee, hip, and shoulder arthroplasties, and spine implants were 14.5, 10.3, 7, and 4.6 mg/l, respectively. Using these cutoffs, sensitivity and specificity to detect infection were 79 and 88% for knee, 74 and 79% for hip, and 63 and 73% for shoulder arthroplasties, and 79 and 68% for spine implants. CRP and ESR have poor sensitivity for the diagnosis of shoulder implant infection. A CRP of 4.6 mg/l had a sensitivity of 79 and a specificity of 68% to detect infection of spine implants.This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Postoperative Joint Infections Due toPropionibacteriumSpecies: A Case‐Control StudyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Infection Associated with Prosthetic JointsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Microbiologic Diagnosis of Prosthetic Shoulder Infection by Use of Implant SonicationJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2009
- Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection following total hip arthroplasty – evaluation of the diagnostic values of pre- and intraoperative parameters and the associated strategy to preoperatively select patients with a high probability of joint infectionJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2008
- Sonication of Removed Hip and Knee Prostheses for Diagnosis of InfectionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Preoperative Evaluations in Revision Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2006
- Late implant infections caused by Propionibacterium acnes in scoliosis surgeryEuropean Spine Journal, 2005
- Value of Preoperative Investigations in Diagnosing Prosthetic Joint Infection: Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature ReviewScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-reactive Protein Values in Patients with Total Hip ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1987
- Changes in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein after Total Hip ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1984