Opposition to Affordable Housing in the USA: Debate Framing and the Responses of Local Actors
- 1 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Housing, Theory and Society
- Vol. 30 (2), 107-130
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2012.667833
Abstract
This article investigates the framing of affordable housing by opponents and responses to this framing by local housing actors in the USA. We use a social construction approach to explore how conceptualizations of race/ethnicity, class and immigration shape opponents views and cast affordable housing tenants as deviant and undeserving, making them undesirable neighbours. Our study finds that affordable housing opposition and the process of framing results in: changes to development designs and siting decisions based on least resistance, rather than sound planning and decision-making, thereby directing affordable housing projects to particular jurisdictions, new development areas or concentrated poor neighbourhoods.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Framing the Oregon Land Use DebateJournal of Planning Education and Research, 2009
- Why do Policy Frames Change? Actor-Idea Coevolution in Debates over Welfare ReformSocial Forces, 2008
- State innovations in affordable housing policy: Lessons from California and New JerseyHousing Policy Debate, 2008
- Does Affordable Housing Detrimentally Affect Property Values? A Review of the LiteratureJournal of Planning Literature, 2005
- Neighbourhood Crime and Scattered-site Public HousingPublished by SAGE Publications ,2003
- Why Are There NIMBYs?Land Economics, 2001
- The Outcomes of Homeless Mobilization: The Influence of Organization, Disruption, Political Mediation, and FramingAmerican Journal of Sociology, 2000
- The residential preferences of blacks and whites: A four‐metropolis analysisHousing Policy Debate, 1997
- Movements and Media as Interacting SystemsThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1993
- Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY SyndromeJournal of the American Planning Association, 1992