From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking
Open Access
- 18 July 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
- Vol. 10 (1), 9
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-10-9
Abstract
Objectives: Resource allocation is a challenging issue faced by health policy decisionmakers requiring careful consideration of many factors. Objectives of this study were to identify decision criteria and their frequency reported in the literature on healthcare decisionmaking. Method: An extensive literature search was performed in Medline and EMBASE to identify articles reporting healthcare decision criteria. Studies conducted with decisionmakers (e.g., focus groups, surveys, interviews), conceptual and review articles and articles describing multicriteria tools were included. Criteria were extracted, organized using a classification system derived from the EVIDEM framework and applying multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) principles, and the frequency of their occurrence was measured. Results: Out of 3146 records identified, 2790 were excluded. Out of 356 articles assessed for eligibility, 40 studies included. Criteria were identified from studies performed in several regions of the world involving decisionmakers at micro, meso and macro levels of decision and from studies reporting on multicriteria tools. Large variations in terminology used to define criteria were observed and 360 different terms were identified. These were assigned to 58 criteria which were classified in 9 different categories including: health outcomes; types of benefit; disease impact; therapeutic context; economic impact; quality of evidence; implementation complexity; priority, fairness and ethics; and overall context. The most frequently mentioned criteria were: equity/fairness (32 times), efficacy/effectiveness (29), stakeholder interests and pressures (28), cost-effectiveness (23), strength of evidence (20), safety (19), mission and mandate of health system (19), organizational requirements and capacity (17), patient-reported outcomes (17) and need (16). Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of considering both normative and feasibility criteria for fair allocation of resources and optimized decisionmaking for coverage and use of healthcare interventions. This analysis provides a foundation to develop a questionnaire for an international survey of decisionmakers on criteria and their relative importance. The ultimate objective is to develop sound multicriteria approaches to enlighten healthcare decisionmaking and priority-setting.Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing Value in Health Care ProgramsJAMA, 2012
- Multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize health interventions: Capitalizing on first experiencesHealth Policy, 2010
- EBM, HTA, and CER: Clearing the ConfusionThe Milbank Quarterly, 2010
- Allocating funds for HIV/AIDS: a descriptive study of KwaDukuza, South AfricaHealth Policy and Planning, 2010
- Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decisionmaking framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patientsCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 2010
- Comparative Effectiveness Research and Evidence‐Based Health Policy: Experience from Four CountriesThe Milbank Quarterly, 2009
- Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applicationsBMC Health Services Research, 2008
- Process Is the PointAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2008
- 6-STEPPPs: A Modular Tool to Facilitate Clinician Participation in Fair Decisions for Funding New Cancer DrugsJournal of Oncology Practice, 2008
- Pathways to “Evidence-Informed” Policy and Practice: A Framework for ActionPLoS Medicine, 2005