Anthropometric and Hormonal Risk Factors for Male Breast Cancer: Male Breast Cancer Pooling Project Results
Open Access
- 19 February 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 106 (3), djt465
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt465
Abstract
The etiology of male breast cancer is poorly understood, partly because of its relative rarity. Although genetic factors are involved, less is known regarding the role of anthropometric and hormonally related risk factors. In the Male Breast Cancer Pooling Project, a consortium of 11 case–control and 10 cohort investigations involving 2405 case patients (n = 1190 from case–control and n = 1215 from cohort studies) and 52013 control subjects, individual participant data were harmonized and pooled. Unconditional logistic regression generated study design–specific (case–control/cohort) odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with exposure estimates combined using fixed effects meta-analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Risk was statistically significantly associated with weight (highest/lowest tertile: OR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.57), height (OR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.38), and body mass index (BMI; OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.51), with evidence that recent rather than distant BMI was the strongest predictor. Klinefelter syndrome (OR = 24.7; 95% CI = 8.94 to 68.4) and gynecomastia (OR = 9.78; 95% CI = 7.52 to 12.7) were also statistically significantly associated with risk, relations that were independent of BMI. Diabetes also emerged as an independent risk factor (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.37). There were also suggestive relations with cryptorchidism (OR = 2.18; 95% CI = 0.96 to 4.94) and orchitis (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.99). Although age at onset of puberty and histories of infertility were unrelated to risk, never having had children was statistically significantly related (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.66). Among individuals diagnosed at older ages, a history of fractures was statistically significantly related (OR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.86). Consistent findings across case–control and cohort investigations, complemented by pooled analyses, indicated important roles for anthropometric and hormonal risk factors in the etiology of male breast cancer. Further investigation should focus on potential roles of endogenous hormones.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Occupation and occupational exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals in male breast cancer: a case-control study in EuropeOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2010
- New insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying effects of estrogen on cholesterol gallstone formationBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, 2009
- Etiologic factors for male breast cancer in the U.S. Veterans Affairs medical care system databaseBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2009
- Prospective Evaluation of Risk Factors for Male Breast CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Alcohol Drinking May Increase Risk of Breast Cancer in Men: A European Population-Based Case–Control StudyCancer Causes & Control, 2004
- Is Male Breast Cancer Similar or Different than Female Breast Cancer?Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2004
- Risk factors for male breast cancer in Canada, 1994–1998European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2002
- Review article: Epidemiology of male breast cancer. A meta‐analysis of published case‐control studies and discussion of selected aetiological factorsInternational Journal of Cancer, 1993
- Risk factors for male breast cancer: A Franco‐Swiss case‐control studyInternational Journal of Cancer, 1990
- Head Trauma and Exposure to Prolactin-Elevating Drugs as Risk Factors for Male Breast CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1988