Comparison of Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Influenza Detection in Adults
- 21 June 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Marshfield Clinic Research Institute in Clinical Medicine & Research
- Vol. 10 (4), 215-218
- https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2012.1084
Abstract
Examine differences in the detection of influenza by specimen and test type using paired nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs. Prospective study Enrollment took place between January and March 2007 in a central Wisconsin population. Adult patients were screened and enrolled by trained research coordinators following medical encounters for acute respiratory illnesses of <10 days duration. Paired nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from consenting patients and tested by both real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) and viral culture. A composite measure of positivity was used as the gold standard; cases included any positive result by rRT-PCR or viral culture from either specimen type. Paired samples were collected from 240 adults; 33 (14%) individuals tested positive for influenza by rRT-PCR. Using rRT-PCR, the sensitivity of the nasal swab was 89% (95% CI, 78%-99%) and the sensitivity of the nasopharyngeal swab was 94% (95% CI, 87%-100%), compared to a composite gold standard. Test sensitivity did not vary significantly by swab type when using a highly sensitive molecular diagnostic test, but power was limited to detect modest differences.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identification of Respiratory Viruses in Adults: Nasopharyngeal versus Oropharyngeal SamplingJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2009
- Effectiveness of Inactivated Influenza Vaccines Varied Substantially with Antigenic Match from the 2004–2005 Season to the 2006–2007 SeasonThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Estimates of US influenza‐associated deaths made using four different methodsInfluenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, 2009
- Comparing Nose-Throat Swabs and Nasopharyngeal Aspirates Collected From Children With Symptoms for Respiratory Virus Identification Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionPublished by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ,2008
- Evaluation of the Quidel QuickVue Test for Detection of Influenza A and B Viruses in the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Setting by Use of Three Specimen Collection MethodsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemicNature, 2006
- Mortality due to Influenza in the United States—An Annualized Regression Approach Using Multiple-Cause Mortality DataAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- Nasal Swab versus Nasopharyngeal Aspirate for Isolation of Respiratory VirusesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Comparative study of nasopharyngeal aspirate and nasal swab specimens for detection of influenzaBMJ, 2001
- Prospective comparative study of culture specimens and methods in diagnosing influenza in adultsBMJ, 1998