Cause-specific prevalence of bilateral visual impairment in Victoria, Australia
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Ophthalmology
- Vol. 108 (5), 960-967
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00554-1
Abstract
To study the cause-specific prevalence of eye diseases causing bilateral visual impairment in Australian adults. Two-site, population-based cross-sectional study. Participants were aged 40 years and older and resident in their homes at the time of recruitment for the study. The study was conducted during 1992 through 1996. The study uses a cluster stratified random sample of 4744 participants from two cohorts, urban, and rural Victoria. Participants completed a standardized interview and eye examination, including presenting and best-corrected visual acuity, visual fields, and dilated ocular examination. The major cause of vision loss was identified for all participants found to be visually impaired. Population-based prevalence estimates are weighted to reflect the age and gender distribution of the two cohorts in Victoria. Visual impairment was defined by four levels of severity on the basis of best-corrected visual acuity or visual field: or =6/60 and/or or =10 degrees radius field, moderate vision impairment; severe vision impairment, or =3/60 and/or or =5 degrees radius field; and profound vision impairment or =6/18, and/or homonymous hemianopia were defined as mild vision impairment. In Australia, legal blindness includes severe and profound vision impairment. The population-weighted prevalence of diseases causing less-than-legal driving or worse impairment in the better eye was 42.48/1000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.11, 54.86). Uncorrected refractive error was the most frequent cause of bilateral vision impairment, 24.68/1000 (95% CI, 16.12, 33.25), followed by age-related macular degeneration (AMD), 3.86/1000 (95% CI, 2.17, 5.55); other retinal diseases, 2.91/1000 (95% CI, 0.74, 5.08); other disorders, 2.80/1000 (95% CI, 1.17, 4.43); cataract, 2.57/1000 (95% CI, 1.38, 3.76); glaucoma, 2.32/1000 (95% CI, 0.72, 3.92); neuro-ophthalmic disorders, 1.80/1000 (95% CI, 0, 4.11); and diabetic retinopathy, 1.53/1000 (95% CI, 0.71, 2.36). The prevalence of legal blindness was 5.30/1000 (95% CI, 3.24, 7.36). Although not significantly different, the causes of legal blindness were uncorrected refractive errors, AMD, glaucoma, other retinal conditions, and other diseases. Significant reduction of visual impairment may be attained with the application of current knowledge in refractive errors, diabetes mellitus, cataract, and glaucoma. Although easily preventable, uncorrected refractive error remains a major cause of vision impairment.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Age-Specific Prevalence and Causes of Blindness and Visual Impairment in an Older PopulationAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1998
- Visual Impairment in Australia: Distance Visual Acuity, Near Vision, and Visual Field Findings of the Melbourne Visual Impairment ProjectAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1997
- Visual Acuity and the Causes of Visual Loss in AustraliaOphthalmology, 1996
- Methods for a population-based study of eye disease: the Melbourne Visual Impairment ProjectOphthalmic Epidemiology, 1994
- Racial Differences in the Cause-Specific Prevalence of Blindness in East BaltimoreNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- The Beaver Dam Eye Study: Visual AcuityOphthalmology, 1991
- Visual Impairment in a Rural Appalachian CommunityPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990
- Blindness and Visual Impairment in an American Urban PopulationAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1990
- The Effect of Perimetric Experience in Normal SubjectsAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1989
- Effect of Ultraviolet Radiation on Cataract FormationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988