The farm cost of decreasing antimicrobial use in dairy production
Open Access
- 22 March 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 13 (3), e0194832
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194832
Abstract
Antimicrobials are used in animal agriculture to cure bacterial infectious diseases. However, antimicrobial use (AMU) inevitably leads to the selection of resistant bacteria, potentially infecting humans. As a global public threat, antimicrobial resistance has led policy makers to implement regulations supervising AMU. The objective of our research was to investigate the farm impact of several potential policies aimed at decreasing AMU. We modeled a dairy herd of 1000 cows with an average level of disease prevalence for the nine most frequent bacterial dairy diseases found in western countries. We calculated the farm net costs of AMU prohibition, as well as cost increases in antimicrobial treatments prices, and an increase in the milk withdrawal period after AMU. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of output and input prices, and disease prevalence. At a mean disease prevalence, the average net costs of not using antimicrobials were $61 per cow per year greater compared to a scenario modeling current farm AMU. The model predicted that the minimum and maximum increased costs associated with AMU prohibition were $46 and $73 per cow per year compared to current AMU. In each scenario, the cost difference increased with disease prevalence. Sensitivity analysis showed that the three stochastic variables which most significantly influenced the cost difference were respectively, cow replacement prices, cow slaughter price, and the milk price. Antimicrobial price increases of a factor of five, or extending the milk withdrawal period by 15 days, resulted in increasing the costs of diseases to a level where the farmer was better off not using antimicrobials. Our results suggest that the farm level costs of AMU prohibition in many cases might be minor, although the consequences of any policy instrument should be carefully evaluated to reach the ultimate goal of decreasing AMU without threatening the sustainability of milk production.Funding Information
- Cornell University (US), Atkinson Center for a sustainable future, (Academic Venture Fund 2017, 555)
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of lameness and claw lesions in cows on health and productionLivestock Science, 2013
- The cost of different types of lameness in dairy cows calculated by dynamic programmingPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 2010
- Control, Management, and Prevention of Bovine Respiratory Disease in Dairy Calves and CowsVeterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 2010
- Stochastic simulation using @Risk for dairy business investment decisionsAgricultural Finance Review, 2010
- Relationship between herd size and annual prevalence of and primary antimicrobial treatments for common diseases on dairy operations in the United StatesPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 2009
- Postpartum uterine disease and dairy herd reproductive performance: A reviewThe Veterinary Journal, 2008
- Association between endometritis diagnosis using a novel intravaginal device and reproductive performance in dairy cattleAnimal Reproduction Science, 2007
- Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: A reviewVeterinary Quarterly, 2007
- Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herdsVeterinary Research, 2003
- The effects of lameness on reproductive performance, milk production and culling in Dutch dairy farmsPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 1994