Association between maternity waiting home stay and obstetric outcomes in Yetebon, Ethiopia: a mixed-methods observational cohort study
Open Access
- 3 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 21 (1), 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03913-3
Abstract
Background: A strategy for reducing adverse pregnancy outcomes is the expanded implementation of maternity waiting homes (MWHs). We assessed factors influencing MWH use, as well as the association between MWH stay and obstetric outcomes in a hospital in rural Ethiopia. Methods: Data from medical records of the Glenn C. Olson Memorial Primary Hospital obstetric ward were cross matched with records from the affiliated MWH between 1 and 2011 to 31 March 2014. Poisson regression with robust variance was conducted to estimate the relative risk (RR) of childbirth complications associated with MWH use vs. non-use. Five key informant interviews of a convenience sample of three MWH staff and two users were conducted and a thematic analysis performed of social, cultural, and economic factors underlying MWH use. Results: During the study period, 489 women gave birth at the hospital, 93 of whom were MWH users. Common reasons for using the MWH were post-term status, previous caesarean section/myomectomy, malposition/malpresentation, and low-lying placenta, placenta previa, or antepartum hemorrhage, and hypertension or preeclampsia. MWH users were more likely than non-users to have had a previous caesarean Sec. (15.1 % vs. 5.3 %, p < 0.001) and to be post-term (21.5 % vs. 3.8 %, p < 0.001). MWH users were also more likely to undergo a caesarean Sec. (51.0 % vs. 35.4 %, p < 0.05) and less likely (p < 0.05) to have a spontaneous vaginal delivery (49.0 % vs. 63.6 %), obstructed labor (6.5 % vs. 14.4 %) or stillbirth (1.1 % vs. 8.6 %). MWH use (N = 93) was associated with a 77 % (adjusted RR = 0.23, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 0.12–0.46, p < 0.001) lower risk of childbirth complications, a 94 % (adjusted RR = 0.06, 95 % CI 0.01–0.43, p = 0.005) lower risk of fetal and newborn complications, and a 73 % (adjusted RR = 0.27, 95 % CI 0.13–0.56, p < 0.001) lower risk of maternal complications compared to MWH non-users (N = 396). Birth weight [median 3.5 kg (interquartile range 3.0-3.8) vs. 3.2 kg (2.8–3.5), p < 0.001] and 5-min Apgar scores (adjusted difference = 0.25, 95 % CI 0.06–0.44, p < 0.001) were also higher in offspring of MWH users. Opportunity costs due to missed work and need to arrange for care of children at home, long travel times, and lack of entertainment were suggested as key barriers to MWH utilization. Conclusions: This observational, non-randomized study suggests that MWH usage was associated with significantly improved childbirth outcomes. Increasing facility quality, expanding services, and providing educational opportunities should be considered to increase MWH use.Funding Information
- Medical Scholars, Stanford University School of Medicine
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors that hinder or enable maternal health strategies to reduce delays in rural and pastoralist areas in EthiopiaTropical Medicine & International Health, 2017
- Challenges of Anesthesia in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Access to Safe Obstetric Anesthesia in East AfricaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2017
- Developing a community driven sustainable model of maternity waiting homes for rural ZambiaMidwifery, 2016
- Husbands’ experiences and perceptions regarding the use of maternity waiting homes in rural ZambiaInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2016
- Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health): a cross-sectional studyThe Lancet, 2013
- Maternity waiting facilities for improving maternal and neonatal outcome in low-resource countriesEmergencias, 2012
- The role of a maternity waiting area (MWA) in reducing maternal mortality and stillbirths in high‐risk women in rural EthiopiaBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2010
- Taking action to improve women's health through gender equality and women's empowermentThe Lancet, 2005
- Effects of a maternity waiting home on adverse maternal outcomes and the validity of antenatal risk screeningInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1994
- Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in contextSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1994