The future of hysterectomy
- 14 January 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 112 (2), 133-139
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00431.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized, prospective, double‐blind comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in women without uterovaginal prolapseActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2003
- Comparative study of vaginal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies for uterine myoma larger than 6 cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450 g: a prospective randomized studyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2002
- Hysterectomy and socioeconomic position in Rome, ItalyJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2002
- Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990–1997Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for the treatment of the uterus weighing >200 gSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Recovery from vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy:Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2001
- Quality of life among women undergoing hysterectomiesObstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Pain and pulmonary function following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy, a randomized studyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1998
- Hysterectomy trends in Finland in 1987-1995 - a register based analysisActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1998
- Small-Area Variations in the Use of Common Surgical Procedures: An International Comparison of New England, England, and NorwayNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982