Does Competition for Capital Discipline Governments? Decentralization, Globalization, and Public Policy
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 95 (3), 817-830
- https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054201314
Abstract
Competition among countries—or regions within them—to attract mobile capital is often thought to discipline their governments, motivating them to invest more in infrastructure, reduce waste and corruption, and spend less on non-productive public goods. The result should be convergence on business-friendly policies. We argue that this requires an assumption—units start out very similar—that is often unrealistic. If units are heterogeneous (in natural resources, geographical location, inherited human capital or infrastructure), capital mobility often weakens discipline on the poorly- endowed units. This may help explain disappointing results of liberalizing capital flows within Russia and sub-Saharan Africa. (JEL F36, H73, H87)Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Globalisation of the Economy and the Nation StateThe World Economy, 1999
- Explaining African Economic PerformanceJournal of Economic Literature, 1999
- The Global Capital Market: Benefactor or Menace?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998
- An Economic Model of Representative DemocracyThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997
- Inflows of Capital to Developing Countries in the 1990sJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1996
- The Origins of Endogenous GrowthJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic GrowthThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992
- Asymmetric tax competitionJournal of Urban Economics, 1991
- Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goodsJournal of Urban Economics, 1986
- Prizes and Incentives: Towards a General Theory of Compensation and CompetitionThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1983