True ovarian volume is underestimated by two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound measurement
- 23 December 2008
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier BV in Fertility and Sterility
- Vol. 93 (3), 995-998
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.055
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients: a comparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle countFertility and Sterility, 2007
- A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcomeHuman Reproduction Update, 2006
- The accuracy of examination under anesthesia and transvaginal sonography in evaluating ovarian sizeGynecologic Oncology, 2005
- Ovarian reserve and reproductive age may be determined from measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonographyHuman Reproduction, 2004
- The interobserver reliability of ovarian volume measurement is improved with three-dimensional ultrasound, but dependent upon techniqueJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- A prospective study of predictive factors of ovarian response in 'standard' IVF/ICSI patients treated with recombinant FSH. A suggestion for a recombinant FSH dosage normogramHuman Reproduction, 2003
- Antimüllerian hormone serum levels: a putative marker for ovarian agingFertility and Sterility, 2002
- Ovarian volume may predict assisted reproductive outcomes better than follicle stimulating hormone concentration on day 3Human Reproduction, 1999
- Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound: reproducibility of ovarian and endometrial volume measurementsFertility and Sterility, 1996
- Ovarian volumes measured by US: bigger than we think.Radiology, 1990