Is there evidence that walking groups have health benefits? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Open Access
- 31 May 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 49 (11), 710-715
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094157
Abstract
Objective To assess the health benefits of outdoor walking groups. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of walking group interventions examining differences in commonly used physiological, psychological and well-being outcomes between baseline and intervention end. Data sources Seven electronic databases, clinical trial registers, grey literature and reference lists in English language up to November 2013. Eligibility criteria Adults, group walking outdoors with outcomes directly attributable to the walking intervention. Results Forty-two studies were identified involving 1843 participants. There is evidence that walking groups have wide-ranging health benefits. Meta-analysis showed statistically significant reductions in mean difference for systolic blood pressure -3.72 mm Hg (-5.28 to -2.17) and diastolic blood pressure -3.14 mm Hg (-4.15 to -2.13); resting heart rate -2.88 bpm (-4.13 to -1.64); body fat -1.31% (-2.10 to -0.52), body mass index -0.71 kg/m(2) (-1.19 to -0.23), total cholesterol -0.11 mmol/L (-0.22 to -0.01) and statistically significant mean increases in VO2max of 2.66 mL/kg/min (1.67-3.65), the SF-36 (physical functioning) score 6.02 (0.51 to 11.53) and a 6 min walk time of 79.6 m (53.37-105.84). A standardised mean difference showed a reduction in depression scores with an effect size of -0.67 (-0.97 to -0.38). The evidence was less clear for other outcomes such as waist circumference fasting glucose, SF-36 (mental health) and serum lipids such as high-density lipids. There were no notable adverse side effects reported in any of the studies. Conclusions Walking groups are effective and safe with good adherence and wide-ranging health benefits. They could be a promising intervention as an adjunct to other healthcare or as a proactive health-promoting activity.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do interventions to promote walking in groups increase physical activity? A meta-analysisInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2013
- The implementation of a community-based aerobic walking program for mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis: A knowledge translation randomized controlled trial: Part II: Clinical outcomesBMC Public Health, 2012
- Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 2012
- Changes in pain and insulin-like growth factor 1 in fibromyalgia during exercise: the involvement of cerebrospinal inflammatory factors and neuropeptidesArthritis Research & Therapy, 2012
- Does moderate-to-high intensity Nordic walking improve functional capacity and pain in fibromyalgia? A prospective randomized controlled trialArthritis Research & Therapy, 2010
- Cost-utility of a walking programme for moderately depressed, obese, or overweight elderly women in primary care: a randomised controlled trialBMC Public Health, 2008
- The effect of walking and vitamin B supplementation on quality of life in community-dwelling adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized, controlled trialQuality of Life Research, 2007
- Interventions to promote walking: systematic reviewBMJ, 2007
- THE INVERSE CARE LAWThe Lancet, 1971