Is chromosome testing of the second miscarriage cost saving? A decision analysis of selective versus universal recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation
- 31 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Fertility and Sterility
- Vol. 98 (1), 156-161
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.038
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus medical management of early pregnancy lossFertility and Sterility, 2012
- Patient desire for chromosome analysis of products of conception following miscarriage: a national surveyFertility and Sterility, 2011
- Pregnancy of unknown location: a consensus statement of nomenclature, definitions, and outcomeFertility and Sterility, 2011
- Diagnostic factors identified in 1020 women with two versus three or more recurrent pregnancy lossesFertility and Sterility, 2010
- Accurate chromosome testing of miscarriages with manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) and DNA technologies: overcoming culture failure and maternal cell contamination (MCC) from cultured deciduaFertility and Sterility, 2009
- Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy lossFertility and Sterility, 2008
- Evaluation and Management of Recurrent Early Pregnancy LossClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- Evidence-based investigations and treatments of recurrent pregnancy lossFertility and Sterility, 2005
- Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Combination with Flow Cytometry Improves Results of Cytogenetic Analysis of Spontaneous AbortionsAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2000
- Indications for examination of spontaneous abortion specimens: A reassessmentAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995