Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review
- 1 December 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Vol. 115 (6), 849-860
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev350
Abstract
Emergency laparotomies are performed commonly throughout the world, but one in six patients die within a month of surgery. Current international initiatives to reduce the considerable associated morbidity and mortality are founded upon delivering individualised perioperative care. However, while the identification of high-risk patients requires the routine assessment of individual risk, no method of doing so has been demonstrated to be practical and reliable across the commonly encountered spectrum of presentations, co-morbidities and operative procedures. A systematic review of Embase and Medline identified 20 validation studies assessing 25 risk assessment tools in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. The most frequently studied general tools were APACHE II, ASA-PS and P-POSSUM. Comparative, quantitative analysis of tool performance was not feasible due to the heterogeneity of study design, poor reporting and infrequent within-study statistical comparison of tool performance. Reporting of calibration was notably absent in many prognostic tool validation studies. APACHE II demonstrated the most consistent discrimination of individual outcome across a variety of patient groups undergoing emergency laparotomy when used either preoperatively or postoperatively (area under the curve 0.76-0.98). While APACHE systems were designed for use in critical care, the ability of APACHE II to generate individual risk estimates from objective, exclusively preoperative data items may lead to better-informed shared decisions, triage and perioperative management of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Future endeavours should include the recalibration of APACHE II and P-POSSUM in contemporary cohorts, modifications to enable prediction of morbidity and assessment of the impact of adoption of these tools on clinical practice and patient outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort studyThe Lancet, 2012
- Incidence and estimated annual cost of emergency laparotomy in England: is there a major funding shortfall?*Anaesthesia, 2012
- The Peptic Ulcer Perforation (PULP) score: a predictor of mortality following peptic ulcer perforation. A cohort studyActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2011
- Are Targeted Preoperative Risk Prediction Tools More Powerful? A Test of Models for Emergency Colon Surgery in the Very ElderlyJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2011
- High-Risk SurgeryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2011
- Defining higher-risk surgeryCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 2010
- Comparison of Hospital Performance in Nonemergency Versus Emergency Colorectal Operations at 142 HospitalsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2010
- Variation in Hospital Mortality Associated with Inpatient SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Pre-operative risk scores for the prediction of outcome in elderly people who require emergency surgeryWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery, 2007
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985