Accommodating Religious and Moral Objections to Neurological Death
- 1 June 2009
- journal article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The Journal of Clinical Ethics
- Vol. 20 (2), 183-191
- https://doi.org/10.1086/jce200920213
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Family's Request for Complementary Medicine After Patient Brain DeathJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2008
- News from the President’s Council on BioethicsKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2007
- Religion, Conscience, and Controversial Clinical PracticesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Brain Death — Too Flawed to Endure, Too Ingrained to AbandonThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2007
- Eye on Religion: Considering the Influence of Buddhist and Shinto Thought on Contemporary Japanese BioethicsSouthern Medical Journal, 2007
- The Whole-Brain Concept of Death Remains Optimum Public PolicyThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2006
- Ethics Consultation: Persistent Brain Death and Religion: Must a Person Believe in Death to Die?The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 1995
- Brain Death and Organ Transplantation: Cultural Bases of Medical Technology [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 1994
- Response of Buddhism and Shintō to the Issue of Brain Death and Organ TransplantCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 1994
- Japan's Dilemma with the Definition of DeathKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1991