UK Accountants' Perceptions of Research Journal Quality
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Accounting and Business Research
- Vol. 26 (3), 265-278
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1996.9729516
Abstract
The process of research quality assessment is now firmly established in UK universities. The quality of the journals in which academic papers are published is an important input to the assessment process. The relative quality of these journals is clearly difficult to establish in an objective manner. This paper contributes to the debate about relative quality by conducting a peer review. Eighty-eight UK accounting academics reported their degree of familiarity with, and perceptions of quality of, a total of 44 journals in the accounting and finance discipline. Accounting and Business Research and theBritish Accounting Review were the two most familiar academic journals. The most highly ranked journals were generally from the US.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Questioning the value of the research selectivity process in British university accountingAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1995
- Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case studyOmega, 1995
- UK Accounting Academics And Publication: An Exploration Of Observable Variables Associated With Publication OutputThe British Accounting Review, 1994
- The Familiarity with and Perceived Quality of Accounting Journals: Views of Senior Accounting Faculty in Leading U.S. MBA Programs*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1994
- ‘Consistency and stability of UK academic publication output criteria in accounting’: A commentThe British Accounting Review, 1989
- Consistency and stability of UK academic publication output criteria in accountingThe British Accounting Review, 1989
- Teaching and educational notes: Evaluating the accounting professor's journal publicationsJournal of Accounting Education, 1983
- Journal ranking by citation analysis: Some inconsistencies.American Psychologist, 1978
- The name of the journal fame game: Quality or familiarity?American Psychologist, 1976
- Ratings of psychology journals by members of the American Psychological Association.American Psychologist, 1975