Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?
Open Access
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 93 (4), 891-899
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2586119
Abstract
As political campaigns become increasingly adversarial, scholars are giving some much-needed attention to the effect of negative advertising on turnout. In a widely recognized Review article and subsequent book, Ansolabehere and his colleagues (1994, 1995) contend that attack advertising drives potential voters away from the polls. We dispute the generalizability of this claim outside the experimental setting. Using NES survey data as well as aggregate sources, we subject their research to rigorous real-world testing. The survey data directly contradict their findings, yielding no evidence of a turnout disadvantage for those who recollected negative presidential campaign advertising. In attempting to replicate Ansolabehere et al.'s earlier aggregate results we uncover quite substantial discrepancies and inconsistencies in their data set. We conclude that their aggregate study is deeply flawed and that Ansolabehere et al. exaggerated the demobilization dangers posed by attack advertising, at least in voters' own context.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case StudyAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1996
- Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News and NewspapersAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1996
- Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?American Political Science Review, 1994
- TrumanForeign Affairs, 1992
- The Rise of Candidate-Centered PoliticsPublished by Harvard University Press ,1991
- Surge and Decline: A Study of Electoral ChangePublic Opinion Quarterly, 1960