Accuracy of a sequential approach to identify young febrile infants at low risk for invasive bacterial infection
- 14 July 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Emergency Medicine Journal
- Vol. 31 (e1), e19-e24
- https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-202449
Abstract
Introduction Much effort has been put in the past years to create and assess accurate tools for the management of febrile infants. However, no optimal strategy has been so far identified. A sequential approach evaluating, first, the appearance of the infant, second, the age and result of the urinanalysis and, finally, the results of the blood biomarkers, including procalcitonin, may better identify low risk febrile infants suitable for outpatient management. Objective To assess the value of a sequential approach (‘step by step’) to febrile young infants in order to identify patients at a low risk for invasive bacterial infections (IBI) who are suitable for outpatient management and compare it with other previously described strategies such as the Rochester criteria and the Lab-score. Methods A retrospective comparison of three different approaches (step by step, Lab-score and Rochester criteria) was carried out in 1123 febrile infants less than 3 months of age attended in seven European paediatric emergency departments. IBI was defined as isolation of a bacterial pathogen from the blood or cerebrospinal fluid. Results Of the 1123 infants (IBI 48; 4.2%), 488 (43.4%) were classified as low-risk criteria according to the step by step approach (vs 693 (61.7%) with the Lab-score and 458 (40.7%) with the Rochester criteria). The prevalence of IBI in the low-risk criteria patients was 0.2% (95% CI 0% to 0.6%) using the step by step approach; 0.7% (95% CI 0.1% to 1.3%) using the Lab-score; and 1.1% (95% CI 0.1% to 2%) using the Rochester criteria. Using the step by step approach, one patient with IBI was not correctly classified (2.0%, 95% CI 0% to 6.12%) versus five using the Lab-score or Rochester criteria (10.4%, 95% CI 1.76% to 19.04%). Conclusions A sequential approach to young febrile infants based on clinical and laboratory parameters, including procalcitonin, identifies better patients more suitable for outpatient management.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- DenouementThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2012
- Diagnostic Value of Leukopenia in YOUNG Febrile InfantsThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2012
- Validation of a laboratory risk index score for the identification of severe bacterial infection in children with fever without sourceArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2010
- Performance of Low-Risk Criteria in the Evaluation of Young Infants With Fever: Review of the LiteraturePEDIATRICS, 2010
- Blood Culture and Bacteremia Predictors in Infants Less Than Three Months of Age With Fever Without SourceThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2010
- A Score Identifying Serious Bacterial Infections in Children With Fever Without SourceThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2008
- Identification of febrile neonates unlikely to have bacterial infectionsThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1997
- Efficacy of a Protocol to Distinguish Risk of Serious Bacterial Infection in the Outpatient Evaluation of Febrile Young InfantsClinical Pediatrics, 1993
- Ambulatory care of febrile infants younger than 2 months of age classified as being at low risk for having serious bacterial infectionsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1988
- Difficulties in universal application of criteria identifying infants at low risk for serious bacterial infectionThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1986