Paternalism or partnership?
- 18 September 1999
- Vol. 319 (7212), 719-720
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.719
Abstract
Paternalism is endemic in the NHS. Benign and well intentioned it may be, but it has the effect of creating and maintaining an unhealthy dependency which is out of step with other currents in society. Assumptions that doctor (or nurse) knows best, making decisions on behalf of patients without involving them and feeling threatened when patients have access to alternative sources of medical information—these signs of paternalism should have no place in modern health care. The articles assembled in this issue of the BMJ consider the scope for creating meaningful partnerships between doctors and patients and between health policymakers and local communities. Partners work together to achieve common goals. Their relationship is based on mutual respect for each other's skills and competencies and recognition of the advantages of combining these resources to achieve beneficial outcomes. Successful partnerships are non-hierarchical and the partners share decision making and responsibility. The key to successful doctor-patient partnerships is therefore to recognise that patients are experts too.1–3 The doctor is, or should be, well informed about diagnostic techniques, the causes of disease, prognosis, …This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic reviewBMJ, 1999
- Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrarsBMJ, 1999
- Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional surveyBMJ, 1999
- Helping patients access high quality health informationBMJ, 1999
- Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making Commentary: Competencies for informed shared decision making Commentary: Proposals based on too many assumptionsBMJ, 1999
- Patient participation in decision-makingSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1998
- Managing demand: Matching demand and supply fairly and efficientlyBMJ, 1998
- Offering Choice of treatment to patients with cancers. A review based on a symposium held at the 10th annual conference of the British psychosocial oncology group, December 1993European Journal of Cancer, 1995
- Patients' Preferences and General Practitioners' Decisions in the Treatment of Menstrual DisordersFamily Practice, 1994
- Dealing With Medical Practice Variations: A Proposal for ActionHealth Affairs, 1984