Post-ESWL, clinically insignificant residual stones: reality or myth?
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Urology
- Vol. 59 (1), 20-24
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01494-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- REASSESSING THE EFFICACY OF THE DORNIER MFL-5000 LITHOTRIPTORJournal of Urology, 2000
- Effect of Vibration Massage Therapy after Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Patients with Lower Caliceal StonesJournal of Endourology, 1999
- Minor Residual Fragments after Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy: Spontaneous Clearance or Risk Factor for Recurrent Stone Formation?Journal of Endourology, 1997
- Renal Stone Fragments Following Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1997
- Clinical Implications of Clinically Insignificant Stone Fragments After Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1996
- Limitations of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Lower Caliceal Stones: Anatomic Insight*Journal of Endourology, 1994
- Fate of Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy with EDAP LT-01 LithotripterJournal of Endourology, 1993
- ESWL, including imagingCurrent Opinion in Urology, 1992
- Results of One and Two Year Follow-Up in a Clinical Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal CalculiScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1992
- Two-Year Follow-up of Patients Treated with Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Endourology, 1988