3D coronary MR angiography at 1.5 T: Volume-targeted versus whole-heart acquisition
- 31 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 38 (3), 594-602
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24015
Abstract
Purpose: To compare volume‐targeted acquisition with whole‐heart acquisition in 1.5‐T free‐breathing 3D coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with parallel imaging. Materials and Methods: The major coronary arteries were imaged in 36 subjects using the whole‐heart and volume‐targeted acquisitions with comparable imaging parameters. The quantitative and semiquantitative data derived from these two acquisition methods were analyzed statistically, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Both the right coronary artery (RCA) / left circumflex artery (LCX)‐ and the left main (LM) / left anterior descending (LAD)‐targeted acquisitions had similar results in navigator efficiencies and apparent signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) in comparison with whole‐heart acquisition. Apparent contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) of the volume‐targeted imaging was significantly higher than that of the whole‐heart imaging. The imaging time required for a whole‐heart scan was significantly longer than each of the RCA/LCX‐ and LM/LAD‐targeted acquisitions. However, the sum of scanning times derived from volume‐targeted imaging was significantly longer than that of whole‐heart acquisition. Both RCA/LCX‐ and LM/LAD‐targeted acquisition yield higher vessel sharpness and overall image quality in comparison with whole‐heart acquisition. The lengths of the major coronary arteries were not significantly different for the whole‐heart and volume‐targeted approaches. The whole‐heart method was obviously superior to the volume‐targeted method in terms of visualization of the posterior descending artery. Conclusion: For current 1.5‐T navigator coronary MRA, volume‐targeted and whole‐heart acquisitions have their own advantages and the choice of methods may vary in accordance with the different aims of clinical practice. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;38:594–602.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceCirculation, 2010
- Volume‐targeted and whole‐heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography using an intravascular contrast agentJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2009
- A study of in vitro and in vivo MR of free-breathing whole-heart 3D coronary angiography using parallel imagingThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2009
- 3-T Navigator Parallel-Imaging Coronary MR Angiography: Targeted-Volume Versus Whole-Heart AcquisitionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2008
- Coronary Artery Anomalies and Variants: Technical Feasibility of Assessment with Coronary MR Angiography at 3 TRadiology, 2008
- Noninvasive assessment of coronary vasodilation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients at high risk for coronary artery diseaseJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2008
- Comparison of 3D Free-Breathing Coronary MR Angiography and 64-MDCT Angiography for Detection of Coronary Stenosis in Patients with High Calcium ScoresAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2007
- Encoding and reconstruction in parallel MRINMR in Biomedicine, 2006
- Noninvasive assessment of coronary vasodilation using magnetic resonance angiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Nitrate‐induced coronary vasodilation by stress‐magnetic resonance imaging: A novel noninvasive test of coronary vasomotionJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2004