Validation of cardiologists’ decisions to initiate reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction with electrocardiograms viewed on liquid crystal displays of cellular telephones
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 140 (5), 747-752
- https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2000.110288
Abstract
The transmission of 12-lead electrocardiograms from remote locations to hand-held computers of cardiologists is now possible with the development of wireless technology and computer software. This investigation determined whether the cardiologist's decisions regarding reperfusion therapy for patients with symptoms suggestive of an acute myocardial infarction are the same when given electrocardiograms displayed on a cellular telephone as on a standard paper recording. Cardiologists were given 20 electrocardiograms of patients with acute chest pain suggestive of acute myocardial infarction to test the diagnostic reliability of the Nokia 9000i cellular telephone liquid crystal display (LCD) screen. The cardiologists made their decision to initiate or not initiate reperfusion therapy for the patients after viewing their electrocardiograms displayed on both 5-mm and 1-mm formatted grids and twice on traditional printout electrocardiograms. The control level of intraobserver agreement between the responses from the 2 sets of paper display electrocardiograms was compared with the experimental level of intraobserver agreement between the 1-mm LCD electrocardiograms and both sets of paper display electrocardiograms to determine whether the viewing medium affected the cardiologist's decisions. The 1-mm and 5-mm LCD screen electrocardiograms were compared to determine if the grid size affected the cardiologist's decisions. Ninety-three percent of the 2 sets of paper-guided decisions were in agreement. When comparing the 1-mm LCD-guided decisions with both sets of paper-guided decisions, 94% and 89% of the decisions, respectively, were in agreement. The differences between the control and experimental degrees of intraobserver agreement of 1% and 4% were not statistically significant (P1 =.81, P2 =.29). Ninety-one percent of the 1-mm LCD-guided decisions were in agreement with the 5-mm LCD-guided decisions. Cardiologists' decisions did not vary significantly when viewing either traditional paper electrocardiograms or LCD screen electrocardiograms. Even though there was not a significant difference in the cardiologists' decisions when they viewed electrocardiograms displayed on both the 1-mm and 5-mm grid, it is recommended that the 1-mm grid be used for clinical implementation of the LCD screen.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Prehospital Electrocardiogram in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Is Its Full Potential Being Realized? fn1fn1The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 is supported by Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- Prehospital-Initiated vs Hospital-Initiated Thrombolytic TherapyJAMA, 1993
- Efficiency of a physician-operated mobile intensive care unit for prehospital thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Prehospital diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction: A North-South perspectiveAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- A prospective evaluation of prehospital 12-lead ECG application in chest pain patientsJournal of Electrocardiology, 1991
- The diagnostic impact of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiographyAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1990
- Impact of field-transmitted electrocardiography on time to in-hospital thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- A Computer Protocol to Predict Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Department Patients with Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency RoomArchives of Internal Medicine, 1985
- Computer Evaluation of Statistical Properties of Clinical Information in the Differential Diagnosis of Chest PainMethods of Information in Medicine, 1968