Enhancing the Reflexivity of System Innovation Projects With System Analyses
- 21 May 2010
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Journal of Evaluation
- Vol. 31 (2), 143-161
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010366046
Abstract
Networks aiming for fundamental changes bring together a variety of actors who are part and parcel of a problematic context. These system innovation projects need to be accompanied by a monitoring and evaluation approach that supports and maintains reflexivity to be able to deal with uncertainties and conflicts while challenging current practices and related institutions. This article reports on experiences with reflexive process monitoring (RPM)—an approach that has been applied in several networks in the Dutch agricultural sector, which strive for sustainable development. Particular attention is paid to conducting system analyses—a core element of the methodology. The first results show that system analyses indeed have the potential to enhance reflexivity if carried out collectively. However, regular patterns of thinking and acting within projects interfere in subtle ways with the new knowledge generated and limit the transformation of the reflexive feedback and insights into action.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Learning about AdvocacyEvaluation, 2008
- Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of InterventionsEvaluation, 2008
- Horizontal EvaluationAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 2007
- A system failure framework for innovation policy designTechnovation, 2005
- Sharing StoriesEvaluation & the Health Professions, 2005
- From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theoryResearch Policy, 2004
- Practices for reflexive design: lessons from a Dutch programme on sustainable agricultureInternational Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 2004
- Inclusive Evaluation: Implications of Transformative Theory for EvaluationAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 1999
- Sustainability and sustainable development: Historical and conceptual reviewEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review, 1998
- Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive EvaluationPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1983