Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?
Open Access
- 1 January 2012
- journal article
- Published by Hogrefe Publishing Group in Zeitschrift für Psychologie
- Vol. 220 (2), 121-129
- https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000103
Abstract
One of the most frequently voiced criticisms of the peer review process is gender bias. In this study we evaluated the grant peer review process (external reviewers’ ratings, and board of trustees’ final decision: approval or no approval for funding) at the Austrian Science Fund with respect to gender. The data consisted of 8,496 research proposals (census) across all disciplines from 1999 to 2009, which were rated on a scale from 1 to 100 (poor to excellent) by 18,357 external reviewers in 23,977 reviews. In line with the current state of research, we found that the final decision was not associated with applicant’s gender or with any correspondence between gender of applicants and reviewers. However, the decisions on the grant applications showed a robust female reviewer salience effect. The approval probability decreases (up to 10%), when there is parity or a majority of women in the group of reviewers. Our results confirm an overall gender null hypothesis for the peer review process of men’s and women’s grant applications in contrast to claims that women’s grants are systematically downrated.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variantsJournal of Informetrics, 2011
- Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in scienceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Scientific peer reviewAnnual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2011
- Multilevel AnalysisPublished by Taylor & Francis Ltd ,2010
- How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender studyJournal of Informetrics, 2008
- A Note on Comparing the Estimates of Models for Cluster-Correlated or Longitudinal Data with Binary or Ordinal OutcomesPsychometrika, 2008
- Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysisJournal of Informetrics, 2007
- Gatekeepers of science—Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applicationsJournal of Informetrics, 2007
- The gender similarities hypothesis.American Psychologist, 2005
- A Multilevel Cross-Classified Modelling Approach to Peer Review of Grant Proposals: The Effects of Assessor and Researcher Attributes on Assessor RatingsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2003