Common and Specific Elements of Psychosocial Treatments for Bipolar Disorder: A Survey of Clinicians Participating in Randomized Trials
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Psychiatric Practice
- Vol. 14 (2), 77-85
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pra.0000314314.94791.c9
Abstract
Background. There are 14 randomized trials that indicate the benefits of various adjunctive psychosocial interventions for bipolar disorder. Efficient planning of future interventions requires identification of the common, putatively active components of these treatments. We investigated whether different forms of psychotherapy consisted of overlapping versus modality-specific ingredients. Methods. We identified five categories of active psychosocial treatment in 14 trials: cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT; 4 studies), family psychoeducation (5 studies), interpersonal and social rhythm therapy (IPSRT; 2 studies), individual psychoeducation (3 studies), and group psychoeducation (5 studies). In this study, 31 investigators and therapists who participated in these trials completed a questionnaire in which they rated the frequency of 17 treatment strategies in their active and treatment-as-usual (TAU) conditions. A content analysis of the results of this questionnaire was then done, in which the active treatments were compared with each other and with TAU on the frequency of use of each strategy. Results. The active modalities were distinguished from TAU by more frequent use of problem-solving and interventions to enhance patients' ability to cope with the stigma of mental illness. With regard to specific approaches, CBT made frequent use of cognitive restructuring and self-rated mood charts. The signature features of IPSRT-regulation of sleep/wake cycles and daily routines-were also regular features in the CBT and group psychoeducation interventions. Communication skills training was a distinctive feature of family treatments. Conclusions. Whereas active psychosocial interventions for bipolar disorder have common ingredients, they can also be distinguished from each other and from TAU by the degree to which specific strategies are emphasized. Future research should compare the treatment ingredients identified in this study in terms of their ability to bring about clinical change.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychosocial Treatments for Bipolar DepressionArchives of General Psychiatry, 2007
- New Psychosocial Interventions for Bipolar Disorder: A Review of Literature and Introduction of the Systematic Treatment Enhancement ProgramJournal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2006
- Cognitive–behavioural therapy for severe and recurrent bipolar disordersThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2006
- Patient Treatment Adherence in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Acute Psychosis: The Role of Recovery Style and Working AllianceBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2005
- The nature and treatment of depression in bipolar disorder: A review and implications for future psychological investigationClinical Psychology Review, 2005
- The current status of psychological treatments in bipolar disorders: a systematic review of relapse preventionBipolar Disorders, 2004
- Does adjunctive family therapy enhance recovery from bipolar I mood episodes?Journal of Affective Disorders, 2004
- MULTI‐FAMILY PSYCHOEDUCATION GROUPS IN THE TREATMENT OF CHILDREN WITH MOOD DISORDERSJournal of Marital and Family Therapy, 2003
- Family-focused treatment versus individual treatment for bipolar disorder: Results of a randomized clinical trial.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2003
- Predicting the effect of cognitive therapy for depression: A study of unique and common factors.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1996