Lifestyle variables and the risk of myocardial infarction in the General Practice Research Database
Open Access
- 18 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
- Vol. 7 (1), 38-8
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-7-38
Abstract
The primary objective of this study is to estimate the association between body mass index (BMI) and the risk of first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). As a secondary objective, we considered the association between other lifestyle variables, smoking and heavy alcohol use, and AMI risk. This study was conducted in the general practice research database (GPRD) which is a database based on general practitioner records and is a representative sample of the United Kingdom population. We matched cases of first AMI as identified by diagnostic codes with up to 10 controls between January 1st, 2001 and December 31st, 2005 using incidence density sampling. We used multiple imputation to account for missing data. We identified 19,353 cases of first AMI which were matched on index date, GPRD practice and age to 192,821 controls. There was a modest amount of missing data in the database, and the patients with missing data had different risks than those with recorded values. We adjusted our analysis for each lifestyle variable jointly and also for age, sex, and number of hospitalizations in the past year. Although a record of underweight (BMI 2) did not alter the risk for AMI (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87–1.11) when compared with normal BMI (18.0–24.9 kg/m2), obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) predicted an increased risk (adjusted OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.35–1.47). A history of smoking also predicted an increased risk of AMI (adjusted OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.75–1.87) as did heavy alcohol use (adjusted OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.06–1.26). This study illustrates that obesity, smoking and heavy alcohol use, as recorded during routine care by a general practitioner, are important predictors of an increased risk of a first AMI. In contrast, low BMI does not increase the risk of a first AMI.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of Overweight With Increased Risk of Coronary Heart Disease Partly Independent of Blood Pressure and Cholesterol LevelsA Meta-analysis of 21 Cohort Studies Including More Than 300 000 PersonsArchives of Internal Medicine, 2007
- Antimicrobial Drugs and Community-acquired Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureus,United KingdomEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Comparison of Body Mass Index Versus Waist Circumference With the Metabolic Changes That Increase the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Insulin-Resistant IndividualsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- The obesity paradox in non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Results from the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines Quality Improvement InitiativeAmerican Heart Journal, 2006
- Use of First- and Second-Generation Cyclooxygenase-2–Selective Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs and Risk of Acute Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 2006
- Impact of obesity on long-term prognosis following acute myocardial infarctionInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control studyThe Lancet, 2004
- Impact of body mass index on In-Hospital outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (report from the New York State Angioplasty Registry)11*This study was performed with the permission of the New York State Department of Health, which retains ownership of the registry.The American Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- Overweight and obesity in patients with established coronary heart disease: Are we meeting the challenge?European Heart Journal, 2004
- Body-Mass Index and Mortality in a Prospective Cohort of U.S. AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999