What Patients Say About Their Doctors Online: A Qualitative Content Analysis
Top Cited Papers
- 4 January 2012
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 27 (6), 685-692
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1958-4
Abstract
Doctor rating websites are a burgeoning trend, yet little is known about their content. To explore the content of Internet reviews about primary care physicians. Qualitative content analysis of 712 online reviews from two rating websites. We purposively sampled reviews of 445 primary care doctors (internists and family practitioners) from four geographically dispersed U.S. urban locations. We report the major themes, and because this is a large sample, the frequencies of domains within our coding scheme. Most reviews (63%) were positive, recommending the physician. We found a major distinction between global reviews, “Dr. B is a great doctor.” vs. specific descriptions which included interpersonal manner, “She always listens to what I have to say and answers all my questions.”; technical competence “No matter who she has recommended re: MD specialists, this MD has done everything right.”; and/or systems issues such as appointment and telephone access. Among specific reviews, interpersonal manner “Dr. A is so compassionate.” and technical competence “He is knowledgeable, will research your case before giving you advice.” comments tended to be more positive (69% and 80%, respectively), whereas systems-issues comments “Staff is so-so, less professional than should be…” were more mixed (60% positive, 40% negative). The majority of Internet reviews of primary care physicians are positive in nature. Our findings reaffirm that the care encounter extends beyond the patient–physician dyad; staff, access, and convenience all affect patient’s reviews of physicians. In addition, negative interpersonal reviews underscore the importance of well-perceived bedside manner for a successful patient–physician interaction.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- e-Ana and e-Mia: A Content Analysis of Pro–Eating Disorder Web SitesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2010
- Patients’ Evaluations of Health Care Providers in the Era of Social Networking: An Analysis of Physician-Rating WebsitesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- Exposure to Tobacco on the Internet: Content Analysis of Adolescents' Internet UsePEDIATRICS, 2009
- Understanding Patient Satisfaction, Trust, and Loyalty to Primary Care PhysiciansMedical Care Research and Review, 2008
- Patient Choice in General Practice: The Implications of Patient Satisfaction SurveysJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2008
- German doctors fear that performance rating websites may be libellousBMJ, 2007
- A Demonstration of the Impact of Response Bias on the Results of Patient Satisfaction SurveysHealth Services Research, 2002
- Doctor–parent–child communication. A (re)view of the literatureSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2001
- Provision of primary-preventive health care services by obstetrician-gynecologistsObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Patient exposition and provider explanation in routine interviews and hypertensive patients' blood pressure control.Health Psychology, 1987