Are Electronic Medical Records Helpful for Care Coordination? Experiences of Physician Practices
- 22 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 25 (3), 177-185
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1195-2
Abstract
Policies promoting widespread adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) are premised on the hope that they can improve the coordination of care. Yet little is known about whether and how physician practices use current EMRs to facilitate coordination. We examine whether and how practices use commercial EMRs to support coordination tasks and identify work-around practices have created to address new coordination challenges. Semi-structured telephone interviews in 12 randomly selected communities. Sixty respondents, including 52 physicians or staff from 26 practices with commercial ambulatory care EMRs in place for at least 2 years, chief medical officers at four EMR vendors, and four national thought leaders. Six major themes emerged: (1) EMRs facilitate within-office care coordination, chiefly by providing access to data during patient encounters and through electronic messaging; (2) EMRs are less able to support coordination between clinicians and settings, in part due to their design and a lack of standardization of key data elements required for information exchange; (3) managing information overflow from EMRs is a challenge for clinicians; (4) clinicians believe current EMRs cannot adequately capture the medical decision-making process and future care plans to support coordination; (5) realizing EMRs' potential for facilitating coordination requires evolution of practice operational processes; (6) current fee-for-service reimbursement encourages EMR use for documentation of billable events (office visits, procedures) and not of care coordination (which is not a billable activity). There is a gap between policy-makers' expectation of, and clinical practitioners' experience with, current electronic medical records' ability to support coordination of care. Policymakers could expand current health information technology policies to support assessment of how well the technology facilitates tasks necessary for coordination. By reforming payment policy to include care coordination, policymakers could encourage the evolution of EMR technology to include capabilities that support coordination, for example, allowing for inter-practice data exchange and multi-provider clinical decision support.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stimulating the Adoption of Health Information TechnologyThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Costs And Benefits Of Health Information Technology: New Trends From The LiteratureHealth Affairs, 2009
- The Need to Test the Patient-Centered Medical HomeJAMA, 2008
- Coordinating Care — A Perilous Journey through the Health Care SystemThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Deficits in Communication and Information Transfer Between Hospital-Based and Primary Care PhysiciansJAMA, 2007
- Adoption of Patient-Centered Care Practices by PhysiciansArchives of Internal Medicine, 2006
- The Value Of Electronic Health Records In Solo Or Small Group PracticesHealth Affairs, 2005
- Missing Clinical Information During Primary Care VisitsJAMA, 2005
- The Value Of Health Care Information Exchange And InteroperabilityHealth Affairs, 2005
- Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient settingJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2003