Measuring the Importance of Teamwork: The Reliability and Validity of Job/Task Analysis Indices for Team-Training Design
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Military Psychology
- Vol. 6 (4), 206-214
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp0604_1
Abstract
Training interventions designed to improve coordination and communication in the cockpit increasingly emphasize the teaching of specific coordination skills. However, there is little guidance in the literature regarding the manner by which these skills should be selected. This investigation compared a variety of task- importance indices used previously with individual tasks in predicting the overall importance of team tasks. All of the indices demonstrated relatively poor reliability. Composite indices, including one newly derived index, demon- strated greater validity. The results are discussed in terms of implications for future research and for team-training design.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of Coordination Demand for Aircrew Coordination TrainingMilitary Psychology, 1993
- Development of a Task Information Taxonomy for Human Performance SystemsMilitary Psychology, 1990
- Determining important tasks within jobs: A policy-capturing approach.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989
- The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision makingPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1982
- Individual differences in the decision process of employment interviewers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973
- A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making.American Psychologist, 1971