Vascular Access for Hemodialysis Patients
Open Access
- 11 April 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Vol. 14 (6), 954-961
- https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.00490119
Abstract
This commentary critically examines key assumptions and recommendations in the 2006 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative vascular access guidelines, and argues that several are not relevant to the contemporary United States hemodialysis population. First, the guidelines prefer arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) over arteriovenous grafts (AVGs), on the basis of their superior secondary survival and lower frequency of interventions and infections. However, intent-to-treat analyses that incorporate the higher primary failure of AVFs, demonstrate equivalent secondary survival of both access types. Moreover, the lower rate of AVF versus AVG infections is counterbalanced by the higher rate of catheter-related bloodstream infections before AVF maturation. In addition, AVFs with assisted maturation (interventions before successful AVF use), which account for about 50% of new AVFs, are associated with inferior secondary patency compared with AVGs without intervention before successful use. Second, the guidelines posit lower access management costs for AVFs than AVGs. However, in patients who undergo AVF or AVG placement after starting dialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC), the overall cost of access management is actually higher in patients receiving an AVF. Third, the guidelines prefer forearm over upper arm AVFs. However, published data demonstrate superior maturation of upper arm versus forearm AVFs, likely explaining the progressive increase in upper arm AVFs in the United States. Fourth, AVFs are thought to fail primarily because of aggressive juxta-anastomotic stenosis. However, recent evidence suggests that many AVFs mature despite neointimal hyperplasia, and that suboptimal arterial vasodilation may be an equally important contributor to AVF nonmaturation. Finally, CVC use is believed to result in excess mortality in patients on hemodialysis. However, recent data suggest that CVC use is simply a surrogate marker of sicker patients who are more likely to die, rather than being a mediator of mortality.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Maintenance and Salvage of Arteriovenous FistulasJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2006
- Effect of Change in Vascular Access on Patient Mortality in Hemodialysis PatientsAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2006
- Establishment and Maintenance of Vascular Access in Incident Hemodialysis PatientsJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2005
- Timing of first cannulation and vascular access failure in haemodialysis: an analysis of practice patterns at dialysis facilities in the DOPPSNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2004
- Vascular Access and All-Cause MortalityJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2004
- The association of initial hemodialysis access type with mortality outcomes in elderly medicare ESRD patientsAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2003
- Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: Problems and solutionsKidney International, 2002
- Effect of preoperative sonographic mapping on vascular access outcomes in hemodialysis patientsKidney International, 2001
- Comparison of transposed brachiobasilic fistulas to upper arm grafts and brachiocephalic fistulasKidney International, 2001
- Predictors of adequacy of arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patientsKidney International, 1999