Dynamic assessments on high-level waste and low- and intermediate-level waste generation from open and closed nuclear fuel cycles in Republic of Korea
Open Access
- 15 April 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology
- Vol. 51 (9), 1141-1153
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2014.905804
Abstract
We estimated the generation of low- and intermediate-level waste (LILW) and high-level waste (HLW) from open and closed nuclear fuel cycles. The closed fuel cycle reflects the development and deployment of fast reactors and pyroprocessing from 2013 to 2100, while the open fuel cycle only considers pressurized water reactors. The closed fuel cycle hardly affects short-term spent fuel management but can save nearly 60% space of interim storage compared with the open fuel cycle. Compared with the open fuel cycle, the accumulated volume of HLW can be significantly reduced in the closed fuel cycle up to over 95% in 2100. For this volume reduction, high heat generating fission products should be separated from transuranic waste in pyroprocessing and stored in decay storages for a few hundred years. Mining and milling waste in the closed fuel cycle decreases by about 31%. In contrast, the closed fuel cycle generates 3.0%–4.5% more LILW than the open fuel cycle because fast reactors and pyroprocessing produce more LILW and conversion, enrichment, and fabrication produce less LILW. In the closed fuel cycle, operation and decommissioning wastes from reactor and pyroprocessing, respectively, contribute to 74% and 8% of LILW excluding mining and milling waste.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling and system analysis of fuel cycles for nuclear power sustainability (I): Uranium consumption and waste generationAnnals of Nuclear Energy, 2014
- Environmental assessment of advanced partitioning, transmutation, and disposal based on long-term risk-informed regulation: PyroGreenProgress in Nuclear Energy, 2012
- Comparative study of different nuclear fuel cycle options: Quantitative analysis on material flowEnergy Policy, 2011
- Fourteen lessons learned from the successful nuclear power program of the Republic of KoreaEnergy Policy, 2009
- ADVANCED SFR DESIGN CONCEPTS AND R&D ACTIVITIESNuclear Engineering and Technology, 2009
- Advanced Fuel Cycle Economic Analysis of Symbiotic Light-Water Reactor and Fast Burner Reactor SystemsPublished by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) ,2009
- Dynamic Systems Analysis Report for Nuclear Fuel RecyclePublished by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) ,2008
- Dynamic analysis of a thorium fuel cycle in CANDU reactorsAnnals of Nuclear Energy, 2008
- DYNAMIC MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE FUEL CYCLE SCENARIOS IN KOREANuclear Engineering and Technology, 2007
- Radioactive Waste Arisings from Various Fuel Cycle OptionsJournal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2002