Comparison Between Non-invasive (Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Derived) and Invasive-Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Serial Stenoses Within One Coronary Artery: A NXT Trial substudy
- 2 September 2015
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Annals of Biomedical Engineering
- Vol. 44 (2), 580-589
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1436-y
Abstract
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been established as gold standard to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Non-invasive FFR derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA; FFRCT) has demonstrated higher diagnostic performance compared with FFR. However, the accuracy and potential advantages of FFRCT compared with invasive FFR in coronary arteries with serial lesions have not been examined. The aim of this study was to compare trans-lesional gradient in FFRCT to that in invasive FFR in coronary arteries with serial stenoses. Eighteen vessels with serial coronary lesions from 18 stable angina patients were evaluated with angiography, FFR, and coronary CTA. FFRCT was computed from 3-dimensional CT model and coronary flow dynamics data. Multiple FFRCT values were co-registered with measured FFR across the lesions, and trans-lesional delta were compared between FFRCT and FFR. The mean values of the most distal FFR and FFRCT in the same co-registered regions were 0.72 ± 0.10 and 0.69 ± 0.11, respectively. In 13 vessels (72.2%), FFR was ≤0.80, while in 14 vessels (77.8%), FFRCT was ≤0.80. Trans-lesional delta FFR and FFRCT were 0.10 ± 0.09 and 0.09 ± 0.10 in distal segments, while 0.17 ± 0.10 and 0.22 ± 0.13 in proximal segments, respectively. The coefficient of correlation between trans-lesional delta FFR and FFRCT in each segment was 0.92 (p < 0.001). Trans-lesional delta FFR and FFRCT show an excellent correlation. Further studies are required to determine the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of our findings.Keywords
Funding Information
- Edwards Lifesciences (US)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Novel Noninvasive Technology for Treatment Planning Using Virtual Coronary Stenting and Computed Tomography-Derived Computed Fractional Flow ReserveКАРДИОЛОГИЯ УЗБЕКИСТАНА, 2014
- Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) studyJournal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, 2013
- Clinical and Physiological Outcomes of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Serial Stenoses Within One Coronary ArteryJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2012
- Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided PCI versus Medical Therapy in Stable Coronary DiseaseThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Patient Management After Noninvasive Cardiac ImagingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012
- Economic Evaluation of Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel DiseaseCirculation, 2010
- Current Concepts of Integrated Coronary Physiology in the Catheterization LaboratoryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2010
- SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines CommitteeJournal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, 2009
- Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort studyThe Lancet, 2007
- Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess Serial Epicardial StenosesCirculation, 2000