It has been suggested [e.g., Strange e t a l., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 7 4, 695–705 (1983); Verbrugge and Rakerd, Language Speech2 9, 39–57 (1986)] that the temporal margins of vowels in consonantal contexts, consisting mainly of the rapid CV and VC transitions of CVC’s, contain dynamic cues to vowel identity that are not available in isolated vowels and that may be perceptually superior in some circumstances to cues which are inherent to the vowels proper. However, this study shows that vowel‐inherent formant targets and cues to vowel‐inherent spectral change (measured from nucleus to offglide sections of the vowel itself) persist in the margins of /bVb/ syllables, confirming a hypothesis of Nearey and Assmann [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 8 0, 1297–1308 (1986)]. Experiments were conducted to test whether listeners might be using such vowel‐inherent, rather than coarticulatory information to identify the vowels. In the first experiment, perceptual tests using ‘‘hybrid silent center’’ syllables (i.e., syllables which contain only brief initial and final portions of the original syllable, and in which speaker identity changes from the initial to the final portion) show that listeners’ error rates and confusion matrices for vowels in /bVb/ syllables are very similar to those for isolated vowels. These results suggest that listeners are using essentially the same type of information in essentially the same way to identify both kinds of stimuli. Statistical pattern recognition models confirm the relative robustness of nucleus and vocalic offglide cues and can predict reasonably well listeners’ error patterns in all experimental conditions, though performance for /bVb/ syllables is somewhat worse than for isolated vowels. The second experiment involves the use of simplified synthetic stimuli, lacking consonantal transitions, which are shown to provide information that is nearly equivalent phonetically to that of the natural silent center /bVb/ syllables (from which the target measurements were extracted). Although no conclusions are drawn about other contexts, for speakers of Western Canadian English coarticulatory cues appear to play at best a minor role in the perception of vowels in /bVb/ context, while vowel‐inherent factors dominate listeners’ perception.