Playing God in Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Synthetic Biology and the Meaning of Life
Open Access
- 29 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in NanoEthics
- Vol. 3 (3), 257-268
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-009-0079-6
Abstract
The emergent new science of synthetic biology is challenging entrenched distinctions between, amongst others, life and non-life, the natural and the artificial, the evolved and the designed, and even the material and the informational. Whenever such culturally sanctioned boundaries are breached, researchers are inevitably accused of playing God or treading in Frankenstein’s footsteps. Bioethicists, theologians and editors of scientific journals feel obliged to provide an authoritative answer to the ambiguous question of the ‘meaning’ of life, both as a scientific definition and as an explication with wider existential connotations. This article analyses the arguments mooted in the emerging societal debates on synthetic biology and the way its practitioners respond to criticism, mostly by assuming a defiant posture or professing humility. It explores the relationship between the ‘playing God’ theme and the Frankenstein motif and examines the doctrinal status of the ‘playing God’ argument. One particularly interesting finding is that liberal theologians generally deny the religious character of the ‘playing God’ argument—a response which fits in with the curious fact that this argument is used mainly by secular organizations. Synthetic biology, it is therefore maintained, does not offend so much the God of the Bible as a deified Nature. While syntheses of artificial life forms cause some vague uneasiness that life may lose its special meaning, most concerns turn out to be narrowly anthropocentric. As long as synthetic biology creates only new microbial life and does not directly affect human life, it will in all likelihood be considered acceptable.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- 23. Contributions from Practical Theology and EthicsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2009
- That Was the Synthetic Biology That WasPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2009
- Biology from the bottom upNature, 2008
- Knowledge‐making distinctions in synthetic biologyBioEssays, 2007
- Synthetic biology: lessons from the history of synthetic organic chemistryNature Chemical Biology, 2007
- Synthetic biology projects in vitroGenome Research, 2006
- “Playing God? Yes!” Religion in the Light of TechnologyZygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 2002
- Critique of Pure ReasonThe Philosophical Review, 2002
- Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology.The American Historical Review, 1990
- Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political ThoughtTechnology and Culture, 1978