Climate change and insurance: a critical appraisal
- 1 February 1998
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Energy Policy
- Vol. 26 (3), 257-262
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4215(97)00143-2
Abstract
Several issues relating to insurance and the damage costs of climate change are discussed. it is argued that the option of insuring climate change is severely limited because the associated damages are hardly quantifiable and little diversifiable; in addition, binding contracts are a problem on long time scales and in an international context. Hedging, consumption smoothing over time, precautionary investments and liability are not to be presented under the heading of insurance, not only because this unnecessarily and confusingly expands the traditional definition of insurance, but also because this could create a false sense of security. The impact of climate change on the profitability of the commercial insurance sector is not likely to be severe, as the insurance companies are capable of shifting changed risks to the insured, provided that they are properly and timely informed on the consequences of climate change.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Climate change and the insurance industry: the cost of increased risk and the impetus for actionEcological Economics, 1997
- The damage costs of climate change towards a dynamic representationEcological Economics, 1996
- Uncertainties in global climate change estimatesClimatic Change, 1996
- Global risk managementJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1996
- The damage costs of climate change toward more comprehensive calculationsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 1995
- Global Environmental RisksJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1993
- Some estimates of the insurance value against climate change from reducing greenhouse gas emissionsResource and Energy Economics, 1993
- Temporal fluctuations in weather disasters: 1950?1989Climatic Change, 1992
- Insurance Implications of Climatic ChangeThe Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 1992
- Risk Aversion in the Small and in the LargeEconometrica, 1964