Comparison of Polyurethane Foam to Nylon Flocked Swabs for Collection of Secretions from the Anterior Nares in Performance of a Rapid Influenza Virus Antigen Test in a Pediatric Emergency Department
- 1 March 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 48 (3), 852-856
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01897-09
Abstract
Rapid antigen testing of upper respiratory secretions collected with various swab types is often utilized for laboratory diagnoses of influenza virus infection. There are limited data on the effects of swab composition on test performance. This study compared the performance of the Quidel QuickVue Influenza A+B test on secretions from the anterior nares when a polyurethane foam swab was used for collection to that when a nylon flocked swab was used for collection. One hundred subjects who presented to a pediatric emergency department with symptoms suggestive of an influenza virus infection were recruited for the study. Foam and flocked swabs of the anterior nares were obtained from separate nares of each subject before a posterior nasopharyngeal swab was collected and placed into viral transport medium. The QuickVue test was performed directly on each swab type, and the results were compared to the results of reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test, and viral culture performed on the transport medium. RT-PCR alone and DFA combined with culture were utilized as separate gold standards. There were 56 cases of influenza detected by RT-PCR; the QuickVue test was positive for 40 foam and 30 flocked swabs, for sensitivities of 71% and 54%, respectively ( P = 0.01). Similarly, there were 49 influenza cases detected by DFA and/or culture; the QuickVue test was positive for 38 foam and 30 flocked swabs, for sensitivities of 78% and 61%, respectively ( P = 0.13). This study suggests that polyurethane foam swabs perform better than nylon flocked swabs for the collection of secretions from anterior nares in the Quidel QuickVue Influenza A+B test.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- New point of care test is highly specific but less sensitive for influenza virus A and B in children and adultsJournal of Medical Virology, 2004
- Influenza virological surveillance in children: The use of the Quickvue rapid diagnostic testJournal of Medical Virology, 2004
- Superiority of Reverse‐Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction to Conventional Viral Culture in the Diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in ChildrenThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Impact of the Rapid Diagnosis of Influenza on Physician Decision-Making and Patient Management in the Pediatric Emergency Department: Results of a Randomized, Prospective, Controlled TrialPEDIATRICS, 2003
- Comparison of the Directigen Flu A+B Test, the QuickVue Influenza Test, and Clinical Case Definition to Viral Culture and Reverse Transcription-PCR for Rapid Diagnosis of Influenza Virus InfectionJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Impact of Oseltamivir Treatment on Influenza-Related Lower Respiratory Tract Complications and HospitalizationsArchives of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Nasal Swab versus Nasopharyngeal Aspirate for Isolation of Respiratory VirusesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Rapid painless diagnosis of viral respiratory infectionArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2002
- Evaluation of diagnostic tests for influenza in a pediatric practiceThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2002
- Influenza and the Rates of Hospitalization for Respiratory Disease among Infants and Young ChildrenThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2000