Take my paradigm … please! The legacy of Kuhn’s construct in educational research
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
- Vol. 19 (1), 11-34
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500450177
Abstract
Thomas Kuhn developed the construct of research paradigms to make sense of the history of conceptual change in the physical sciences. The construct has since been appropriated by a number of academic fields and by non‐academics as well. This paper traces the use of the construct in the educational research field. The bulk of the paper is organized around two questions: (a) Was it ever appropriate to characterize the educational research field’s acceptance of qualitative methods as equivalent to one of Kuhn’s paradigm revolutions? (b) Is paradigm talk appropriate today?Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment: “Science” Rejects PostmodernismEducational Researcher, 2002
- Reply to Commentators on "Scientific Culture and Educational Research"Educational Researcher, 2002
- Paradigm Talk (and Its Absence) in the Second Edition of the Handbook of Research on Educational AdministrationEducational Administration Quarterly, 1999
- The New Paradigm Wars: Is There Room for Rigorous Practitioner Knowledge in Schools and Universities?Educational Researcher, 1999
- Freeing ourselves from neo-colonial domination in research: A Maori approach to creating knowledgeInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1998
- Teacher research: the question that persistsInternational Journal of Leadership in Education, 1998
- Coloring Epistemologies: Are Our Research Epistemologies Racially Biased?Educational Researcher, 1997
- Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post‐structural perspectivesTheory Into Practice, 1992
- Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared CraftEducational Researcher, 1984
- The contribution of psychology to education.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1910