World Heritage Site—Is It an Effective Brand Name?
- 24 September 2010
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Travel Research
- Vol. 50 (5), 482-495
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510379158
Abstract
Is the designation World Heritage Site (WHS) effective? Does it yield high net brand equity? The five research objectives in the present study seek to explore awareness of the designation/logo, the meanings attached to the designation, the effects of the designation on tourists’ intended future behaviors, the relationship between number of WHSs and a country’s image, and the relationship between perception of a site as part of the world heritage and tourist behaviors. The postpositivistic research began with an exploratory stage followed by structured questionnaires focusing on a Christian heritage site in Israel. The findings indicate only moderate awareness of the designation/logo barely affecting behaviors. However, the cumulative effect of WHS designations is positively related to willingness to revisit a particular country. In addition, the findings highlight the significance of the experientially based approach to the management of heritage sites.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reexamination of attendee-based brand equityTourism Management, 2010
- Fundamentalist Christian pilgrimages as a political and cultural forceJournal of Heritage Tourism, 2009
- Strategy and policy for the World Heritage Convention: goals, practices and future solutionsPublished by Elsevier BV ,2006
- Marketing issues and World Heritage SitesPublished by Elsevier BV ,2006
- Implementing the World Heritage Convention: what happens after listing?Published by Elsevier BV ,2006
- PrefacePublished by Elsevier BV ,2006
- ForewordPublished by Elsevier BV ,2006
- How Special Is Special Interest Tourism?Journal of Travel Research, 2005
- PrefacePublished by Elsevier BV ,1998
- Measuring customer‐based brand equityJournal of Consumer Marketing, 1995