Understanding Attributions of Corporate Social Irresponsibility
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review
- Vol. 37 (2), 300-326
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0522
Abstract
Notwithstanding the significance to organizations of external reactions to bad behavior, the corporate social responsibility literature tends to focus on the meaning of and expectations for responsible behavior, rather than on the meaning of irresponsible behavior. Here we develop a theoretical perspective that explicitly focuses on irresponsibility and that particularly helps explain attributions of social irresponsibility in the minds of the firm's observers. In contrast to approaches in the corporate social responsibility literature that tend to deemphasize the role of the individual perceiver of firm behavior in favor of emphasizing such broader social structures as value systems, institutions, and stakeholder relations, our focus is on how the social reality of external expectations for social responsibility is rooted in the perceptions of the beholder. We draw on attribution theory to describe how attributions of irresponsibility stem from the observer's subjective assessments of effect undesirability, corporate culpability, and affected party noncomplicity. We describe how those assessments affect each other and how they are influenced by the observer's perceptions of effect and firm characteristics and by the observer's social identification with the affected party or the implicated corporation. We conclude by describing the important role of frames on irresponsibility attributions.Keywords
This publication has 101 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does the Market Respond to an Endorsement of Social Responsibility? The Role of Institutions, Information, and LegitimacyJournal of Management, 2009
- The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesisStrategic Management Journal, 2008
- Does Business and Society Scholarship Matter to Society? Pursuing a Normative Agenda with Critical Realism and Neoinstitutional TheoryJournal of Business Ethics, 2008
- Running Just to Stand Still? Managing CSR Reputation in an Era of Ratcheting ExpectationsCorporate Reputation Review, 2008
- The “identified victim” effect: an identified group, or just a single individual?Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2005
- Group Entitativity and Social Attribution: On Translating Situational Constraints into StereotypesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1998
- Rules of Causal AttributionMonographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1982
- Manager behavior in a social context: The impact of impression management on attributions and disciplinary actionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1981
- Supervisor's responses to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional modelOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1980
- Attributional processes of leaders in leader—Member interactionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979