Designing an automated clinical decision support system to match clinical practice guidelines for opioid therapy for chronic pain
Open Access
- 12 April 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Implementation Science
- Vol. 5 (1), 26
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-26
Abstract
Opioid prescribing for chronic pain is common and controversial, but recommended clinical practices are followed inconsistently in many clinical settings. Strategies for increasing adherence to clinical practice guideline recommendations are needed to increase effectiveness and reduce negative consequences of opioid prescribing in chronic pain patients. Here we describe the process and outcomes of a project to operationalize the 2003 VA/DOD Clinical Practice Guideline for Opioid Therapy for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain into a computerized decision support system (DSS) to encourage good opioid prescribing practices during primary care visits. We based the DSS on the existing ATHENA-DSS. We used an iterative process of design, testing, and revision of the DSS by a diverse team including guideline authors, medical informatics experts, clinical content experts, and end-users to convert the written clinical practice guideline into a computable algorithm to generate patient-specific recommendations for care based upon existing information in the electronic medical record (EMR), and a set of clinical tools. The iterative revision process identified numerous and varied problems with the initially designed system despite diverse expert participation in the design process. The process of operationalizing the guideline identified areas in which the guideline was vague, left decisions to clinical judgment, or required clarification of detail to insure safe clinical implementation. The revisions led to workable solutions to problems, defined the limits of the DSS and its utility in clinical practice, improved integration into clinical workflow, and improved the clarity and accuracy of system recommendations and tools. Use of this iterative process led to development of a multifunctional DSS that met the approval of the clinical practice guideline authors, content experts, and clinicians involved in testing. The process and experiences described provide a model for development of other DSSs that translate written guidelines into actionable, real-time clinical recommendations.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the Acceptability and Usability of a Decision Support System to Encourage Safe and Effective Use of Opioid Therapy for Chronic, Noncancer Pain by Primary Care ProvidersPain Medicine, 2010
- Grand challenges in clinical decision supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2007
- Patient–Provider Interactions in the Management of Chronic Pain: Current Findings within the Context of Shared Medical Decision Making: Table 1Pain Medicine, 2007
- Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to successBMJ, 2005
- Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient OutcomesJAMA, 2005
- Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and health care outcomesPublished by Wiley ,2003
- Automating Complex Guidelines for Chronic Disease: Lessons LearnedJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2003
- Patient Safety in Guideline-Based Decision Support for Hypertension Management: ATHENA DSSJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2002
- Evaluating Evaluations of Medical Diagnostic SystemsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1996
- Computerizing Guidelines to Improve Care and Patient Outcomes: The Example of Heart FailureJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1995