The conjunction fallacy: A test of averaging hypotheses
Open Access
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Vol. 4 (1), 96-101
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03210779
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky.Psychological Review, 1996
- The Conjunction Fallacy: Differential Incidence as a Function of Descriptive Frames and Educational ContextContemporary Educational Psychology, 1996
- A pattern recognition account of decision makingMemory & Cognition, 1994
- Rational analysis and illogical inferenceBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1991
- Representativeness and conjoint probability.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991
- COGNITION AND BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS: A REVIEW OF RACHLIN'S JUDGMENT, DECISION, AND CHOICE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1990
- The Strength of Conjunctive ExplanationsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1987
- Averaging versus multiplying combination rules of inference judgmentActa Psychologica, 1975
- Differential weighting in integration theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971
- Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965